1850 Slave Schedule Template

ADVERTISEMENT

1850 Slave Schedule
Schedule 2.–Slave Inhabitants in ___________________________ _____ in the County of ____________________ State
of ____________ , enumerated by me, on the _________ day of _______________, 1850 _______________ Ass’t Marchal.
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
Deaf & Dumb,
Deaf & Dumb,
NAMES OF SLAVE OWNERS
blind, insane
NAMES OF SLAVE OWNERS
blind, insane
or idiotic
or idiotic
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
African Americans in the Federal Censuses
African Americans were enumerated in the census as all other U.S. residents from
county in which the African American family resided in 1870.
1870 (the first census year following the Civil War and emancipation) onward. Prior
Starting in 1850, another supplemental schedule, the mortality schedule, listed
to 1870, however, the situation was far different. Although free African Americans
all deaths within a year before the regular census enumeration.
The deaths of
2
were enumerated by name in 1850 and 1860, slaves were consigned to special, far
blacks and mulattoes, both free and slave, are recorded in them, even though their
less informative, schedules in which they were listed anonymously under the names
names have not been included in many of the indexes to these schedules.
The
3
of their owners. The only personal information provided was usually that of age,
deaths of slaves were generally enumerated in four fashions: unnamed (as in the
gender, and racial identity (either black or mulatto). As in the free schedules, there
slave schedules), but perhaps with the owner identified; by first name only; by first
was a column in which certain physical or mental infirmities could be noted. In some
name and surname; and by first name with the owner noted.
instances, the census takers noted an occupation, usually carpenter or blacksmith,
in this column. Slaves aged 100 years or more were given special treatment; their
Notes
names were noted, and sometimes a short biographical sketch was included. In at
1. The use of the slave schedules as supporting documentation is amply demon-
least one instance, that of 1860 Hampshire County, Virginia, the names of all slaves
strated in David H. Streets, Slave Genealogy: A Research Guide with Case Studies
were included on the schedules, but this happy exception may be the only instance
(Bowie, MD: Heritage, 1986), although, not surprisingly, their use is confined to
when the instructions were not followed.
small slaveholdings.
Sometimes the listings for large slaveholdings appear to take the form of family
2. See Loretto Dennis Szucs, “Research in Census Records” in The Source: A Guide-
groupings, but in most cases slaves are listed from eldest to youngest with no appar-
book of American Genealogy, Rev. ed. (Salt Lake City, UT: Ancestry, 1997).
ent effort to portray family structure. In any event, the slave schedules themselves
3. A notable exception is found in Jonnie B. Arnold, Index to 1860 Mortality Sched-
almost never provide conclusive evidence for the presence of a specific slave in the
ule of South Carolina (Greenville, SC: the author, 1982). On the other hand, many
household or plantation of a particular slaveowner. At best, a census slave schedule
of the indexes appearing on the National Archives microfilm publications of these
can provide supporting evidence for a hypothesis derived from other sources.
Prior
schedules, as well as those published by Accelerated Indexing, should be treated
1
to 1850 there were no special slave schedules for the manuscript census, as slave
with caution.
data was recorded as part of the general population schedules. In these, only the
heads of household were enumerated by name.
Editor’s Note: This article was excerpted from Finding Your African American
In the absence of any contradictory information, it might be assumed that a fam-
Ancestors, by David Thackery. Other sources covered in the book include: pro-
ily of freed people enumerated in the 1870 census was living not far from its last
bate records; deeds and other local records; plantation records; other records of
owner, whose surname they also bore. There would, of course, be reasons to dispute
slave births and deaths; runaway slaves; The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and
both assumptions. (Knowledge of the Civil War history of a locality could come into
Abandoned Lands; The Freedman’s Savings and Trust; and military records. Also
play here; for example, such relative stability would not have existed in a Georgia
included are case studies, a selection of slave narratives from a variety of states,
county that was in the path of Sherman’s march to the sea.) Even so, this assump-
bibliographic information, and an extensive listing of additional resources for Afri-
tion represents one of the more obvious exploratory lines of research, especially in
can American research.
the absence of any other options. The first step in testing the hypothesis would be
to search for slaveowners of the same surname in the 1860 slave schedules of the

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go