Katz Index Of Independence In Activities Of Daily Living Page 4

ADVERTISEMENT

Issue Number 23, Revised 2007
Series Editor: Marie Boltz, PhD, APRN, BC, GNP
Managing Editor: Sherry A. Greenberg, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP
New York University College of Nursing
The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale
By: Carla Graf, MS, APRN, BC, University of California, San Francisco
WHY: The assessment of functional status is critical when caring for older adults. Normal aging changes, acute illness, worsening chronic
illness, and hospitalization can contribute to a decline in the ability to perform tasks necessary to live independently in the community. The
information from a functional assessment can provide objective data to assist with targeting individualized rehabilitation needs or to plan for
specific in home services such as meal preparation, nursing care, home-maker services, personal care, or continuous supervision. A
functional assessment can also assist the clinician to focus on the person’s baseline capabilities, facilitating early recognition of changes that
may signify a need either for additional resources or for a medical work-up (Gallo, 2006).
BEST TOOL: The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) is an appropriate instrument to assess independent living
skills (Lawton & Brody, 1969). These skills are considered more complex than the basic activities of daily living as measured by the Katz
Index of ADLs (See Try this: Katz Index of ADLs). The instrument is most useful for identifying how a person is functioning at the present
time, and to identify improvement or deterioration over time. There are eight domains of function measured with the Lawton IADL scale.
Women are scored on all 8 areas of function; historically, for men, the areas of food preparation, housekeeping, laundering are excluded.
Clients are scored according to their highest level of functioning in that category. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent)
to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men.
TARGET POPULATION: This instrument is intended to be used among older adults, and can be used in community or hospital settings.
The instrument is not useful for institutionalized older adults. It can be used as a baseline assessment tool and to compare baseline function
to periodic assessments.
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY: Few studies have been performed to test the Lawton IADL scale psychometric properties. The Lawton IADL
Scale was originally tested concurrently with the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS). Reliability was established with twelve subjects
interviewed by one interviewer with the second rater present but not participating in the interview process. Inter-rater reliability was
established at .85. The validity of the Lawton IADL was tested by determining the correlation of the Lawton IADL with four scales that
measured domains of functional status, the Physical Classification (6-point rating of physical health), Mental Status Questionnaire (10-point
test of orientation and memory), Behavior and Adjustment rating scales (4-6-point measure of intellectual, person, behavioral and social
adjustment), and the PSMS (6-item ADLs). A total of 180 research subjects participated in the study, however, few received all five
evaluations. All correlations were significant at the .01 or .05 level. To avoid potential gender bias at the time the instrument was developed,
specific items were omitted for men. This assessment instrument is widely used both in research and in clinical practice.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The Lawton IADL is an easy to administer assessment instrument that provides self-reported
information about functional skills necessary to live in the community. Administration time is 10-15 minutes. Specific deficits identified can
assist nurses and other disciplines in planning for safe discharge.
Limitations of the instrument can include the self-report or surrogate report method of administration rather than a demonstration of the
functional task. This may lead either to over-estimation or under-estimation of ability. In addition, the instrument may not be sensitive to
small, incremental changes in function.
FOLLOW-UP: The identification of new disabilities in these functional domains warrants intervention and further assessment to prevent
ongoing decline and to promote safe living conditions for older adults. If using the Lawton IADL tool with an acute hospitalization, nurses
should communicate any deficits to the physicians and social workers/case managers for appropriate discharge planning.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
Best practice information on care of older adults: www .
Gallo, J.J., & Paveza, G.J. (2006). Activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living assessment. In J.J. Gallo, H.R. Bogner, T. Fulmer,
& G.J. Paveza (Eds.), Handbook of Geriatric Assessment (4 th ed., pp. 193-240). MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Graf, C. (2006). Functional decline in hospitalized older adults. AJN, 106(1), 58-67.
Lawton, M.P., & Brody, E.M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist,
9(3), 179-186.
Pearson, V. (2000). Assessment of function. In R. Kane, & R. Kane (Eds.), Assessing Older Persons. Measures, Meaning and Practical Applications
(pp. 17-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, post, download, and/or distribute, this material in its entirety only for not-for-profit educational purposes only, provided that
The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, College of Nursing, New York University is cited as the source. This material may be downloaded and/or distributed in electronic
format, including PDA format. Available on the internet at and/or E-mail notification of usage to: hartford.ign@nyu.edu.
59
AJN
April 2008
Vol. 108, No. 4
w
w

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Medical
Go
Page of 4