Self And Peer Assessment Form

ADVERTISEMENT

Self and Peer Assessment Form
One of the advantages of working as a group is that you can all benefit from each other's
strengths. The purpose of this exercise is to give recognition to the varied contributions that
individuals make to the group. The tutor will use the completed form as a guide to distribute
marks between team members. If very large differences occur in the perception of the
contribution of particular individuals, the tutor may ask the group to discuss and to reach an
agreement.
Below is a list of some examples of processes which you will most likely be involved in
completing the project. Depending on the nature of your project, you may modify this list by
adding/deleting some processes, if everyone in the group agrees. This is best done at the
beginning when you have devised a work plan.
Examples of project processes (Please note that the list is only indicative)
1 Ideas and suggestions
2 Leadership, group organisation and support, minute taking
3 Questionnaire design
4 Data collection/analysis
5 Report writing and editing
Using the Self and Peer Assessment Form, independently assess the relative contribution
of each team member, including yourself. You should take into consideration quality and
effectiveness of the contribution as well as amount of effort spent. Consider an
individual’s contribution in terms of the following scale:
Grade
9-10 The individual who earns this evaluation has consistently contributed. He or she has
demonstrated an understanding of the material, a willingness to work consistently to
achieve a high-quality output, to help others, and to be flexible in scheduling.
Essentially, this assessment indicates that the individual has done more than his or
her “fair share” and has shown initiative and interest throughout the term.
7- 8
An individual who earns this evaluation has contributed in an average way.
Performance was generally good but perhaps was inconsistent. This individual did
the tasks that were assigned to him or her but rarely took initiative. Inconsistent
attendance at meetings or lack of preparation at times slowed progress or other
similar tendencies at times diminished a generally solid contribution. This individual
usually contributed his or her fair share.
5-6
This evaluation indicates that the individual performed below reasonable
expectations. Whether it was quality of work, attendance at meetings, preparation,
interest in the project, initiative, understanding of the material, or meeting deadlines,
this individual performed at the level below what one would normally expect.
Essentially, the group would have been better off without the contributions of this
person.
1-4
This range indicates that the individual made insignificant contributions, if any, to the
project and was essentially dead weight. This individual made a minimal effort to get
involved and basically depended on others, though he or she may have contributed
at some point during the semester.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Business
Go
Page of 2