Non-Lausd And Legacy Projects Contractor Evaluation Form
Download a blank fillable Non-Lausd And Legacy Projects Contractor Evaluation Form in PDF format just by clicking the "DOWNLOAD PDF" button.
Open the file in any PDF-viewing software. Adobe Reader or any alternative for Windows or MacOS are required to access and complete fillable content.
Complete Non-Lausd And Legacy Projects Contractor Evaluation Form with your personal data - all interactive fields are highlighted in places where you should type, access drop-down lists or select multiple-choice options.
Some fillable PDF-files have the option of saving the completed form that contains your own data for later use or sending it out straight away.
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2Contractor Evaluation for Non-LAUSD and Legacy Projects
Name of Bidder: _______________________________________________________________________________
Project Name: _________________________________________________________________________________
Location: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number: _____________________________ Project Number: _________________________________
Amount of Contract: ___________________________ Date Completed: _________________________________
Project Owner’s Name: __________________________________________________________________________
Contact Person: _________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________________
Email: _________________________________________________________________________________
=======================================================================================
Timeliness/Schedule
(possible 50 points)
1. Timeliness/Schedule:
a. Did the contractor timely demonstrate capability to develop and update a detailed construction baseline
schedule? (25)
Unsatisfactory (0)
Needs Improvement (7)
Meets Expectations (13)
Exceeds Expectations (19)
Exceptional (25)
b. Were proper and timely notifications submitted for schedule impacts and did the contractor finish the project
on time, including interim milestones? (25)
Unsatisfactory (0)
Needs Improvement (7)
Meets Expectations (13)
Exceeds Expectations (19)
Exceptional (25)
Closeout and Quality of Work
(possible 75 points)
2. Quality of Work, Punch List, Corrections and Deviations:
a. What was the overall assessment of the contractor’s quality of work? (25)
Unsatisfactory (0)
Needs Improvement (7)
Meets Expectations (13)
Exceeds Expectations (19)
Exceptional (25)
b. Did the contractor substitute materials or vary from the specifications/plans without approval? (25)
Unsatisfactory (0)
Needs Improvement (7)
Meets Expectations (13)
Exceeds Expectations (19)
Exceptional (25)
c. Did the Contractor adequately and timely address all minor deficiencies noted at completion? (25)
Unsatisfactory (0)
Needs Improvement (7)
Meets Expectations (13)
Exceeds Expectations (19)
Exceptional (25)
Los Angeles Unified School District
Page 1 of 2
5/1/2016
Facilities Construction Contracts
Non-LAUSD/Legacy Contractor Evaluation
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Business