Form St 04-21 - Recommendation For Decision Page 4

ADVERTISEMENT

16.
On October 14, 2003 the Department issued NPL No. 8667 to Taxpayer
pursuant to 35 ILCS 735/3-7 as a person who was responsible for paying to
the Department the sales tax obligations of ABC for the months of January
2000 through March of 2000. Dept. Ex. No.1.
Conclusions of Law:
The statute that imposes personal liability for paying to the state unpaid corporate
Retailers’ Occupation Tax and Use Tax obligations provides as follows:
Any officer or employee of any taxpayer subject to the
provisions of a tax Act administered by the Department
who has the control, supervision or responsibility of filing
returns and making payment of the amount of any trust tax
imposed in accordance with that Act and who willfully fails
to file the return or make the payment to the Department or
willfully attempts in any other manner to evade or defeat
the tax shall be personally liable for a penalty equal to the
total amount of tax unpaid by the taxpayer including
interest and penalties thereon. 35 ILCS 735/3-7(a).
This section of the statute sets forth two tests for determining whether a person
has personal liability for unpaid sales tax incurred by a corporation. First, the person must
be responsible for accounting for and paying the tax due. Second, the individual must
willfully fail to file or pay the tax shown to be due on the payroll tax returns.
In this case, once the Department introduced into evidence the Notice of
Deficiency under the Director's certificate, its prima facie case was made on the
questions of responsibility and willfulness. Branson v. Dept. of Revenue, 168 Ill.2d 247,
261-262 (1995). The burden then shifted to the Taxpayer to overcome the Department’s
case. Id. To rebut the Department’s prima facie case, Taxpayer had to come forward with
sufficient evidence to disprove the Department’s case. Id., 168 Ill.2d at 262.
4

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 7