Fillable Form Ics 225 - Incident Personnel Performance Rating (Page 2 of 4) in pdf

INCIDENT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE RATING (ICS 225)

1. Name:

2. Incident Name:

3. Incident Number:

10. Evaluation

Rating Factors

N/A

1 – Unacceptable

3 – Met Standards

5 – Exceeded Expectations

17. Ability To Work on a

Used teams ineffectively or at wrong

Skillfully used teams to increase unit

Insightful use of teams raised unit

times. Conflicts mismanaged or

effectiveness, quality, and service.

productivity beyond expectations.

Team:

often left unresolved, resulting in

Resolved or managed group conflict,

Inspired high level of esprit de corps,

Ability to manage, lead and

decreased team effectiveness.

enhanced cooperation, and involved

even in difficult situations. Major

participate in teams,

Excluded team members from vital

team members in decision process.

contributor to team effort. Established

encourage cooperation, and

information. Stifled group

Valued team participation. Effectively

relationships and networks across a

develop esprit de corps.

discussions or did not contribute

negotiated work across functional

broad range of people and groups,

productively. Inhibited cross

boundaries to enhance support of

raising accomplishments of mutual goals

functional cooperation to the

broader mutual goals.

to a remarkable level.

detriment of unit or service goals.



18. Consideration for

Seldom recognized or responded to

Cared for people. Recognized and

Always accessible. Enhanced overall

needs of people; left outside

responded to their needs; referred to

quality of life. Actively contributed to

Personnel/Team Welfare:

resources untapped despite

outside resources as appropriate.

achieving balance among IMT

Ability to consider and respond

apparent need. Ignorance of

Considered individuals' capabilities to

requirements and professional and

to others’ personal needs,

individuals’ capabilities increased

maximize opportunities for success.

personal responsibilities. Strong

capabilities, and

chance of failure. Seldom

Consistently recognized and rewarded

advocate for subordinates; ensured

achievements; support for and

recognized or rewarded deserving

deserving subordinates or other IMT

appropriate and timely recognition, both

application of worklife

subordinates or other IMT members.

members.

formal and informal.

concepts and skills.



Showed difficulty in directing or

A leader who earned others' support

An inspirational leader who motivated

19. Directing Others:

influencing others. Low or unclear

and commitment. Set high work

others to achieve results not normally

Ability to influence or direct

work standards reduced productivity.

standards; clearly articulated job

attainable. Won people over rather than

others in accomplishing tasks

Failed to hold subordinates

requirements, expectations, and

imposing will. Clearly articulated vision;

or missions.

accountable for shoddy work or

measurement criteria; held

empowered subordinates to set goals

irresponsible actions. Unwilling to

subordinates accountable. When

and objectives to accomplish tasks.

delegate authority to increase

appropriate, delegated authority to

Modified leadership style to best meet

efficiency of task accomplishment.

those directly responsible for the task.

challenging situations.



20. Judgment/Decisions

Decisions often displayed poor

Demonstrated analytical thought and

Combined keen analytical thought, an

analysis. Failed to make necessary

common sense in making decisions.

understanding of political processes, and

Under Stress:

decisions, or jumped to conclusions

Used facts, data, and experience, and

insight to make appropriate decisions.

Ability to make sound

without considering facts,

considered the impact of alternatives

Focused on the key issues and the most

decisions and provide valid

alternatives, and impact. Did not

and political realities. Weighed risk,

relevant information. Did the right thing

recommendations by using

effectively weigh risk, cost, and time

cost, and time considerations. Made

at the right time. Actions indicated

facts, experience, political

considerations. Unconcerned with

sound decisions promptly with the best

awareness of impact of decisions on

acumen, common sense, risk

political drivers on organization.

available information.

others. Not afraid to take reasonable

assessment, and analytical

risks to achieve positive results.

thought.



21. Initiative

Postponed needed action.

Championed improvement through new

Aggressively sought out additional

Implemented or supported

ideas, methods, and practices.

responsibility. A self-learner. Made

Ability to originate and act on

Anticipated problems and took prompt

worthwhile ideas and practices work

improvements only when directed to

new ideas, pursue

do so. Showed little interest in

action to avoid or resolve them.

when others might have given up.

opportunities to learn and

career development. Feasible

Pursued productivity gains and

Extremely innovative. Optimized use of

develop, and seek

improvements in methods, services,

enhanced mission performance by

new ideas and methods to improve work

responsibility without guidance

or products went unexplored.

applying new ideas and methods.

processes and decisionmaking.

and supervision.



Failed to meet minimum standards

Committed to health and well-being of

Remarkable vitality, enthusiasm,

22. Physical Ability for the

self and subordinates. Enhanced

of sobriety. Tolerated or condoned

alertness, and energy. Consistently

Job:

others' alcohol abuse. Seldom

personal performance through activities

contributed at high levels of activity.

Ability to invest in the IMT’s

considered subordinates' health and

supporting physical and emotional well-

Optimized personal performance through

future by caring for the

well-being. Unwilling or unable to

being. Recognized and managed

involvement in activities that supported

physical health and emotional

recognize and manage stress

stress effectively.

physical and emotional well-being.

well-being of self and others.

despite apparent need.

Monitored and helped others deal with

stress and enhance health and well-being.



Failed to adequately identify and

Ensured that safe operating procedures

Demonstrated a significant commitment

23. Adherence to Safety:

protect personnel from safety

were followed.

toward safety of personnel.

Ability to invest in the IMT’s

hazards.

future by caring for the safety

of self and others.



24. Remarks:

25. Rated Individual (This rating has been discussed with me):

Signature:

Date/Time:

26. Rated by: Name:

Signature:

Home Unit:

Position Held on This Incident:

ICS 225

Date/Time:

Form Ics 225 - Incident Personnel Performance Rating Page 2

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories