Judge’s Name: __________________________________ Team Letter _________
Judges Template 2017
Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Below Average
Needs Improvement
Score
5 points
4 points
3 Points
2 Points
1 Point
Identify Issues
• Key insights into the case are
• Case is summarized
• Adequate summary of case
• Minimal summary of case,
• Case facts are simply
Possible 20 pts
discussed with limited
effectively
• Some issues identified,
without much analysis
repeated
repetition
• Most of the issues are
others are missed
• Little attempt to prioritize
• No attempt to prioritize
X 4 =
• All critical issues are
identified
• Only most critical issues are
issues
issues
identified and discussed
• Issues are prioritized based
touched on
• Once critical issue is
• Many of the critical issues of
• Issue are prioritized and
on timelines
identified
the case are missed
_________
established based on urgency,
• Critical issues are mentioned
20
timelines and possible
consequences
Solutions
• Solutions address all issues
• Solutions cover most of the
• Solutions are focused only
• A few issues are provided
• Only one central issues is
Possible 20 pts
raised
critical issues of the case
on the most critical issues,
with solutions; however, the
addressed with a solution
• Evidence is offered that
• Evidence is used to support
with underlying issues left
issues are not the most
• There is no evidence
cohesively supports all
solutions in most cases
unaddressed
pertinent
provided to support solutions
solutions
• While reflecting best
• Some solutions are
• Little evidence is provided to
• Solutions are not feasible or
X 4 =
• Solutions are feasible,
practices, solutions may not
supported by evidence
support solutions
realistic, for any kind of
realistic and tailored to the
always consider the unique
• Recommendations may not
• Some recommendations are
organization to employ
type of organization
features of the organization
always be feasible, realistic or
far-fetched, and do not fit well
• There is no rational provided
_________
• Sound business practices are
• Decision process is explained
tailored to organization
• Decision-making process is
for decisions
20
applied to all solutions offered
• Some creativity is apparent
• There is some explanation as
vague, not explained well
• Solutions are not articulated
• Solutions are creative and
in proposed solutions
to how decisions were made
• Solutions are offered, but
clearly or have been missed
show “big picture” “whole-
• Solutions lack creativity, are
are basic and simplistic.
altogether.
organization” thinking
mainly informed by generic
Minimal creative thinking
best practices
applied
HRC West Judging Template 2017