VENDOR
/
S UBCONTRACTOR
P ERFORMANCE
E VALUATION
VENDOR
/
S UBCONTRACTOR
( NAME):
Prepared
b y
( name):
Vendor
/
S ubcontractor
I ndustry:
Date
p repared:
V endor
/
S ubK
P OC
N ame:
Project
# :
Vendor
/
S ubK
P OC
E mail:
Division:
Vendor
/
S ubK
P OC
T elephone:
LocaFon
( where
w as
t he
w ork
/
s ervice
p erformed):
Note:
This
f orm
i s
t o
b e
c ompleted
f or
e ach
v endor
/
s ubcontractor
w ho
r eceived
$ 25,000
or
m ore
o ver
t he
l ife
o f
t he
p roject
/
t ask
o rder.
P roject
m anagement
i s
t asked
with
c ompleFng
t he
f orm
o n
a
F mely
b asis.
1
Was
t he
q uality
o f
t he
w ork
p erformed
b y
t he
i ndicated
s upplier
/
s ubcontractor
s aFsfactory?
YES
NO
Did
t he
s upplier
/
s ub-‐contractor
c omply
w ith
t he
t erms
a nd
c ondiFons
a s
s pecified
i n
t he
S tatement-‐of-‐Work
( SOW)
/
2
subcontractor
a greement?
YES
NO
3
Did
t he
fi nal
w ork
p roduct
m eet
t he
c ontract
r equirements?
YES
NO
4
Did
t he
s upplier
/
s ubcontractor
c omply
w ith
p roject
s afety
r equirements?
YES
NO
5
Did
t he
s upplier
/
s ubcontractor
d eliver
t heir
p roduct
o r
c omplete
t heir
w ork
i n
a
F mely
m anner?
YES
NO
For
S ubcontractor
o nly:
D id
t he
s ubcontractor
p roperly
m anage
a ny
F er
s ubcontractors
i n
a ccordance
w ith
t he
S OW
a nd
6
contract
r equirements?
YES
NO
NA
7 Were
i nvoices
p repared
p roperly
a nd
s ubmiVed
F mely?
W ere
c redit
a djustments
( if
a ny)
i ssued
p romptly?
YES
NO
8
Did
t he
s upplier
/
s ub-‐contractor
c ommunicate
a ny
p otenFal
p roblems
/
i ssues
i n
a
F mely
a nd
t horough
m anner?
YES
NO
NA
9
Did
t he
s upplier
/
s ub-‐contractor
p rovide
r eports
/
d eliverables,
e tc
a s
r equested
i n
a
F mely
m anner?
YES
NO
NA
10
Would
y ou
r ecommend
w orking
w ith
t his
s upplier
/
s ubcontractor
o n
f uture
p rojects?
YES
NO
AddiFonal
C omments:
P lease
i ndicate
a ny
s pecific
o bserva6ons
( posi6ve
o r
n ega6ve)
r ela6ng
t o
t he
w ork
c ompleted
b y
t he
11
indicated
s upplier
/
s ubcontractor
f or
t he
i ndicated
p roject
Version:
M ay
2 012