Scoring Sheet For Old Guard Oral Competition At Student Conferences
ADVERTISEMENT
1SCORING SHEET FOR OLD GUARD ORAL
Program #
COMPETITION AT STUDENT CONFERENCES
Name of Speaker
Name of School
Total Score _______
Title of Presentation
Technical Score _____
RANGE
SCORE
CONTENT
To what extent is the subject of interest to a technical audience? Is credit given for source of material or contribution
Maximum 30 points
by others? How much knowledge of subject was exhibited? Is work independent and original? Is the subject
technical or general in nature?
Subject Matter:
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
General………Technical
Personal Contribution:
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Library Research………Independent Creative Project
Knowledge of Subject:
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Limited……….Complete
ORGANIZATION
Is there any novel approach to the subject? Is there sufficient background information provided in order to introduce
Maximum 30 points
the audience to the subject? Are the facts developed in logical and continuous sequence? Is there a definite
conclusion, and was it adequately based on the facts or data presented?
Introduction:
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Background (eliciting audience interest)……….Objectives, Outline of Presentation
Continuity:
Essential Facts Developed in Logical Sequence
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Conclusion:
Definite and Based on Facts
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
DELIVERY AND EFFECTIVENESS
Are the words distinctly pronounced and was proper volume used to be heard by all? Is proper English used, and is
Maximum 30 points
the vocabulary sufficient? Is personal appearance appropriate? Are there any distracting mannerisms? Is the manner
of delivery (conversation, memorized, read from manuscript) satisfactory? If visual aids are used, how effectively are
they used? Is the presentation within the time limit of 15 minutes allowed?
Vocal Delivery:
Conversation vs. Memorized, Proper Volume, Distinct Pronunciation, Timing
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Body Language:
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
Eye Contact with Audience, Distracting Mannerisms
Visual Aide:
Legibility, Effectiveness
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
DISCUSSION
Is the presentation evoking spontaneous questions from the audience? Are the questions indicating the
need for clarification of facts presented, or were they merely of the type seeking additional information?
Maximum 10 points
How readily and with what self-assurance did the speaker answer questions? Are the answers indicating
knowledge of the subject beyond that disclosed in the original presentation? Is the ability to think
clearly demonstrated?
Discussion
0 . . . . 5 . . . . 10
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Miscellaneous