Abstract Reviewers Rating Form
ADVERTISEMENT
1________________________________
Reviewer’s Name:
2010
CAOT CONFERENCE 2009 - ABSTRACT REVIEWERS RATING FORM
Abstract # NUMBER
Abstract Title:
Title
Abstract Focus:
Practice/Research/Professional Issues/Education/Other
Session Type:
Paper/Poster/Extended Discussion/Student
Category:
Client Group/Related Area
Please provide a rating by placing an X in the appropriate response for each question.
Quality of the Presentation Content (25 points)
Use the following system to rate the quality of the presentation content:
1 = unacceptable: information is incomplete or absent
2 = marginal: missing key information or description
3 = acceptable: provides some information but not overly informative
4 = good: provides the majority of key information
5 = exceptional: informative and comprehensive
1. There is substantial information that is appropriate to the content. The abstract is formatted using the five (5)
headings: Introduction OR Rationale, Objectives, Methods OR Approach, Results OR Practice Implications,
Conclusions. For research, results can include projected or preliminary data, if data not yet compiled. For
extended sessions, method of facilitating the interactive component of the session is clearly described.
Headings
unacceptable
marginal
acceptable
good
exceptional
1
2
3
4
5
a) Introduction OR Rationale
b) Objectives (of project and/or presentation)
c) Methods OR Approach
d) Results OR Practice implications
e) Conclusions
Educational Value (15 points)
low
moderate
high
1
2
3
4
5
2. Interest and appeal to an occupational therapy
audience (e.g., needs to be heard, occupation-based
content, describes historical perspective).
3. Important contribution to practice, research, theory or
knowledge.
4. Novel or innovative contribution (e.g., current trends or
new ideas, relevant to the theme of the conference).
Quality of Written Abstract (10 points)
low
moderate
high
1
2
3
4
5
5. Self-contained (i.e., should not include abbreviations,
acronyms, quotes or extensive reference citations) and
concise/specific (i.e., each sentence is maximally
informative, especially the lead sentence).
6. Coherent and readable (i.e., written in logical
sequence, use of clear vigorous prose, use of the
active not passive voice, avoids use of personal
pronouns).
___ /50
TOTAL SCORE
See Over
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Form Gew-ta-rv-6 - Application For Extension Of Time To File The Ge/use Tax Annual Return & Reconciliation (form G-49), The Ta Tax Annual Return & Reconciliation (form Ta-2), Or The Rvst Annual Return & Reconciliation (dual Rate Form Rv-3
Financial
Related Categories
Parent category: Business