Peer Reviewer Project / Program Evaluation Form printable pdf download

EERE P

EER

EVIEW

UIDE

PPENDICES

J. Peer Reviewer Project/Program Evaluation Form

This sample Peer Review Evaluation Form would be filled out by reviewers after the presentations

and before leaving the review site. This form would be modified depending on the specific

questions addressed in the review. The rating scheme may also be modified, for example, to use a

five part scale such as very poor, marginal, average, good, and very good.

Reviewer #: __________

Date of Review: ____________________

Project/Subprogram/Program:

__________________________________________________________________

Instructions: Reviewers individually rate the program/subprogram/project using three criteria, provide

an overall project rating, and add supporting comments for each. The rating scale for each is composed of

integer values from one to ten, with the ends of the scale representing seriously deficient and outstanding

attributes, respectively. If more space is required for comment, please use the comment continuation

sheet.

Q1. Quality, Productivity, and Accomplishments

Reviewers assess the overall quality, productivity, and record of accomplishments of the project (or set of

projects/activities) or program. For quality and productivity, this includes assessment of:

a) Quality -- the composition and quality of the resources engaged, including people and facilities.

Considered are the team members' honors and awards, their relevant experience relevant, and the balance

of appropriate skills (including collaborators). [For example: A project team may be outstanding, strong,

balanced and experienced; good but would benefit from additional skills; require strengthening; or have

serious shortcomings.]

b) Productivity -- the level of productivity in work underway is assessed by looking at accomplishments

and the value of the accomplishments compared to costs. This includes achievement against planned

goals and objectives, technical targets, awards, or other success measures typical for the type of activity

(such as publications, citations, patents, licenses, prototypes passing requirements tests). [For example:

The levels of productivity may have been exceptional, extensive, reasonable under the circumstances,

marginal, or have little evidence of progress.]

Quality:

Circle the appropriate number for your rating.

Very low quality

Very high quality

Supporting Comments:

________________________________________________________________________________

Project/Program Evaluation Form

J–1

Peer Reviewer Project / Program Evaluation Form