Order Authorizing Single Transaction

ADVERTISEMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
AT _______________
In the Matter of the Protective Proceeding of
)
)
)
)
,
)
Respondent
)
CASE NO.
)
)
ORDER AUTHORIZING SINGLE
TRANSACTION UNDER AS 13.26.440
A hearing in this matter was held on
before Judge/Master
Present were:
Respondent
Respondent was not present for the reason stated on the
record.
Respondent’s Attorney
Visitor
Expert
Petitioner
Guardian Ad Litem
Others:
The court has reviewed
the petition,
the visitor’s report,
the expert’s report
the master’s findings and recommendations, and
any objections from the parties.
FINDINGS
The court finds that:
1.
Notice of the Hearing.
a. The court gave notice of the hearing to the petitioner.
b. The petitioner served notice of the hearing on the persons listed in AS
13.26.420, including the respondent. (form PG-116)
2.
Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The court has jurisdiction
under AS 13.27.110 because Alaska is respondent’s home state as defined in AS
13.27.180.
under AS 13.27.110 because the requirements of the following statute have been
met:
AS 13.27.110(2)
AS 13.27.110(3)
AS 13.27.110(4)
under AS 13.27.120(a)(2) because the real or tangible personal property that will
be affected by the court’s order is located in Alaska.
3.
Venue.
Venue is proper because the respondent
resides here
does not reside in Alaska,
but has property here. AS 13.26.411
4.
Need for Management of Respondent’s Property and Affairs.
A basis for a protective order exists because it has been established that
respondent is an adult and is
(1)
unable to manage his/her property and affairs effectively, and
Page 1 of 3
PG-420 (2/17) (cs)
AS 13.26.010, .401, .430, .435, & 540-.550
ORDER AUTHORIZING SINGLE TRANSACTION
Probate Rule 17

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 3