Bloomsburg
U niversity
D epartment
o f
M usic
Capstone
P roject
G uidelines
The
C apstone
P roject
i s
m eant
a s
a
w ay
f or
s tudents
t o
d isplay
t he
k nowledge,
s kills
a nd
abilities
t hey
h ave
a cquired
t hroughout
t heir
u ndergraduate
m usic
d egree
p rogram.
T he
project
w ill
b e
a mple
i n
s cope,
d epth
a nd
i ntensity
t o
a dequately
s howcase
t he
s tudents’
abilities
a nd
g arnered
k nowledge.
This
g uide
w ill
h elp
t he
s tudent
t hrough
t he
p rocess
o f
c hoosing
a
c apstone
p roject,
f orming
his/her
c ommittee,
u nderstanding
t he
r equirements
o f
t he
p roject,
a nd
h ow
t he
p roject
w ill
be
e valuated.
( See
t he
C apstone
A ssessment
F orm
f or
o bjectives
a nd
r ubric)
Types
o f
P rojects:
T he
c apstone
m ay
t ake
m any
f orms,
b ut
w ill
f all
i nto
o ne
o f
f ive
g eneral
categories:
1. Recital
2. Lecture
R ecital
4. Analysis
p aper
3. Composition/Arrangement
5. Research
P aper
1.
R ecital:
T he
r ecital
c apstone
p roject
w ill
c onsist
o f
a
4 0-‐minute
s enior
r ecital,
p rogram
notes
a nd
a
p aper
o f
a t
l east
s even
p ages,
w hich
w ill
p resent
d etailed
i nformation
o n
t he
pieces
t o
b e
p erformed.
T his
w ould
i nclude
i nformation
o n
c omposers,
p ieces
a nd
s tyles;
putting
t hem
i nto
t heir
h istorical
p erspective.
T he
s tudents
c hoosing
t his
o ption
w ill
n eed
t o
work
v ery
c losely
w ith
t heir
a pplied
i nstructor
t o
c hoose
r ecital
l iterature,
a nd
t o
f orm
t heir
recital
c ommittee.
T his
i ncludes
t he
c ompletion
o f
t he
a ttached
R ecital
C heck
S heet.
Evaluation
o f
t his
p roject
w ill
b e
d one
u sing
t he
R ecital
R ubric.
T he
r ecital
h earing
w ill
b e
performed
d uring
t he
j uries
h eld
t he
s emester
p rior
t o
t hat
o f
t he
p erformance.
2.
L ecture
R ecital:
T he
l ecture
r ecital
w ill
c onsist
o f
b oth
a
p erformance
a nd
l ecture
a bout
the
w orks
p erformed.
T he
p erformance
p ortion
w ill
c onsist
o f
2 0
m inutes
o f
m usic,
a nd
2 0
minutes
o f
l ecture
f or
a
t otal
o f
a
4 0-‐minute
p resentation.
A
c orrelating
p aper
w ill
b e
submitted
p rior
t o
t he
p resentation,
f or
e valuation
b y
t he
c ommittee
u sing
t he
C apstone
Assessment
R ubric
F orm.
3.
C omposition/Arrangement:
T he
C omposition/Arrangement
p roject
w ill
b e
a n
o riginal
composition
o r
a rrangement.
T he
s ubject/style
o f
t he
w ork
w ill
b e
a rrived
a t
b y
consultation
o f
t he
s tudent
w ith
t heir
c apstone
a dvisor
a nd
a pproved
b y
t he
c apstone
committee.
T he
l ength
o f
t he
p iece
w ill
b e
d etermined
b y
t he
s tyle
a nd
t empo
o f
t he
w ork,
but
w ill
b e
j udged
a gainst
t he
s tandard
o f
a
1 5
m inutes
p iece
i n
4 /4
t ime
a t
q = 120.
Evaluation
o f
t his
p roject
w ill
b e
d one
u sing
t he
C apstone
A ssessment
R ubric
F orm.
4.Analysis
P aper:
T he
a nalysis
p aper
w ill
b e
a t
l east
a
t wenty-‐page
p aper
( excluding
t he
title
p age
a nd
b ibliography)
a nalyzing
a
w ork
o r
b ody
o f
w orks
b y
a
c omposer.
T he
s ubject
of
t he
a nalysis
w ill
b e
a ssigned
b y
t he
t heory
f aculty
a nd
a
a pproval
o f
t he
c apstone
committee.
E valuation
o f
t his
p roject
w ill
b e
d one
u sing
t he
C apstone
A ssessment
R ubric
Form.
5.
R esearch
P aper:
T he
r esearch
p aper
w ill
b e
a t
l east
a
t wenty-‐page
p aper
( excluding
t he
title
p age
a nd
b ibliography)
o n
a
s ubject
a rrived
a t
b y
c onsultation
o f
t he
s tudent
w ith
t heir
capstone
a dvisor
a nd
a pproval
o f
t he
c apstone
c ommittee.
E valuation
o f
t his
p roject
w ill
b e
done
u sing
t he
C apstone
A ssessment
R ubric
F orm.
Rev:
9 /2015