Letter Of Recommendation Sample For Former Employee 2 Page 4

ADVERTISEMENT

Graduate Scholarship Recommendation
OCTOBER xx, 20xx
To the UCD School of Film Application Committee:
Letter of Support for John Lerner’s UCD Graduate Scholarship
Perhaps the most memorable discussion I’ve ever had with a student about his decision to switch
majors was three years ago. The student was a first-year Polymer Science and Engineering major on a
scholarship, taking my introductory film class as an elective, and he told me he was considering a switch to
Film. Assuming that this student was simply running into typical academic problems in first-year chemistry
and physics courses, I asked how those courses were going. “Oh, I’m getting As in those,” he assured me
with a calm wave of his hand. “But I long to study Film.” That student was John Lerner.
Since that time, I’ve worked with John as a mentor on several of his papers for classes ranging
from honors composition to film history and theory. In my seven-year career as a film instructor, no
student has been more delightful to work with than has John. His papers are always creative, self-styled,
skillful, and analytical. I quote from a creative essay he wrote during his first year of study, spoofing
college philosophy and psychology classes by claiming that he got through them simply by peppering in
quotations from Ingmar Bergman films: “When my philosophy professor asked me to explain human
reactions to fear, I snapped, ‘In our fear, we make an image, and that image we call God.’ I got an A in the
course.” Later, John as a character in the essay discovers that he can arbitrarily quote Bergman films to
advance his personal relationships as a college student as well, in that college is “a world full of fake
intellectuals.”
This is not to say that John’s work is too quirky or sardonic to thrive in the traditional academic
arena. Another paper he wrote for a film class on Francois Truffaut’s La Nuit Américaine clearly
demonstrates his facility with formal analysis. In this paper, John compares Truffaut’s life to his art (a
staple of film criticism, certainly), but he does not trot out sophomoric insights—rather he analyzes
crisply and complexly, embracing principles of paradox, juxtaposition, technique. One sees John’s gift for
language and analytical focus from the first line of the paper: “The tap of his cane is heard before the first
appearance of the boy on screen—almost an apparition of Antione Doinel—hustling down the sidewalk
toward an imposing set of vertical bars.” In this paper and others I’ve reviewed with John, it’s clear that
he has mastered the art of student paper writing, and he is just as comfortable with a formal analysis of
film noir as he is with dropping in cultural references to vernacular English or Groucho Marx.
I turn to these examples of John’s work so prominently not because I lack other kinds of
evidence, but because as I read his work I am so impressed with the richness and diversity of his talents.
More personally, I have had numerous opportunities to match my opinion of John’s work with that of his
character. I’ve been intrigued and moved by conversations with him about his three adopted siblings. I’ve
spoken with his peers about the particular sensibility that he brings to discussions in his classes, and I’ve
spoken with his other professors about him, one of whom reports that he consistently “raises the tenor of
class discussion greatly.” As a lover of film and a screenplay author, I have enjoyed many relaxed
conversations with John about both film and script writing. As his writing mentor, I have discovered that
he is willing to do complete retooling of a script that is off the mark, or that I need only briefly
characterize a trend in his work for his jaunty mind to apply it to self-improvement.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Letters
Go
Page of 5