Affidavit Of Citizenship And Domicile

ADVERTISEMENT

Affidavit of Citizenship and Domicile
county of ___________________
)
) ss:
North-Carolina American Republic
)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I,_____________________________________________,
Sui Juris, having first-hand knowledge of the facts as stated herein, hereinafter “affiant”, do hereby declare my
proper and lawful status with respect to Citizenship and Domicile, to-wit:
Your affiant’s natural birth occurred in _________________________________________________state,
1.
on the ________________________ day of ________________________________, 19 _________.
2.
Your affiant has been an Inhabitant of North-Carolina from ____________________________, 19 ______
until the present.
Your affiant clearly understands the difference between a “state Citizen” and a “United States citizen;
3.
your affiant is not a federal “U.S. citizen”.
(a) “We have in our political system, a government of each of the several states and a government of
the United States. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own.” U.S. v. Cruikshank,
92 US 542.
(b) “The persons declared to be citizens are ‘..all persons born or naturalized in the United States and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ The evident meaning of these last words is, not merely subject
in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject.” Elk v.
Wilkins, 112 US 94.
(c) “The privileges and immunities clause of the 14
th
Amendment protects very few rights because it
neither incorporates the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this
provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government. It does not
protect those rights which belong to state Citizenship.” Jones v. Temmer, 829 F. Supp. 1226 (1993).
Your affiant clearly understands that the term “United States” has three different meanings, and must be
4.
defined with respect to issues of law and citizenship;
(a) “The term ‘United States’ may be used in any one of the following senses: (1) It may merely be
the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family
of nations or, (2) It may designate the territory over which the United States is sovereign or, (3) It may
be the collective names of the several states which are united by and under the Constitution.” Hooven
& Allison v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (definitions hereinafter referred to as “1
st
nd
Hooven, 2
Hooven, etc.)
(b) “A person is born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, for purposes of acquiring
citizenship at birth, if this birth occurs in a territory over which the United States is sovereign” [2
nd
Hooven]. 3 Am. Jur. 1420.
(c) “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state. NY in re
Merriam, 41 Led 287.
5.
Your affiant is not a person subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress as defined in Article I,
nd
Section 8 (17) of the United States Constitution and any claimed allegiance to the United States (2
Hooven) is
th
hereby renounced. Your affiant is an American, but not a 14
Amendment U.S. citizen.
6.
Your affiant has become aware of 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1481 & 1483, and has noticed that the terms “United States
citizen” and “American citizen” appear to be used interchangeably in the notes, however, as the above
case law clearly demonstrates, there has been established a clear distinction between the two terms. (“U.S.
citizen” referring to 2
nd
Hooven and “American referring to 1
st
rd
and 3
Hooven definitions.)
7.
Any and all contracts or agreements which would tend to indicate that your affiant is a ‘U.S. citizen”; a
citizen of the federal government, are hereby declared to be null and void. Your affiant hereby declares that
any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, and therefore was the
result of Constructive Fraud (Black’s Law Dictionary 6
th
Ed. p. 314).
Your affiant has never volunteered into the Social Security system nor obtained a “S.S.” number. Any
8.
such “identifying number” assigned by someone else belongs to them and is null and void with respect to your
affiant. Your affiant does not and will not use any such identifying number assigned by any entity.
9.
Through a study of history, your affiant has discovered that the de jure state of North-Carolina was laid
st
of the “Reconstruction Acts” on 2 March 1867, and that a new “constitution” was forced upon
dormant as of the 1
her in 1868, completing the forced creation of a federal district known as the State of North Carolina, in direct
contravention of the July 1861 Resolutions of the United States House and Senate.
Page 1 of 2

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 2