Project Risk Management - Advantages And Pitfalls

ADVERTISEMENT

1
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT - ADVANTAGES AND PITFALLS
1
Kenneth K. Humphreys
, PE CCE DIF
1
Past Secretary-Treasurer, ICEC, Granite Falls, NC, United States
Abstract
Proper project decision-making requires that risk management and risk analysis techniques be
applied in order to guide management in making better decisions. Cost estimates attempt to
define projects as single point values whereas virtually all project variables are variable and
may deviate from the values assumed in preparing the original estimate. The objective of this
paper is to demonstrate why risk analysis is necessary, and how to determine the probability
of having a cost overrun. Some pieces of risk analysis software will be described and range
estimating will be demonstrated as an effective tool for reducing risk and for determining how
much contingency to add to reduce residual risk to an acceptable level.
Keywords: risk, contingency, decision-making, cost overruns, Monte Carlo
Introduction
Risk Analysis is often performed using spreadsheets and random number generators,
best case/worst case scenarios, or sensitivity analysis. While these approaches have some
utility, if used with caution and if their limitations are recognized, it is far more practical, and
in most cases requires less effort, to use Monte Carlo software approaches. With this software
one can estimate cost overrun probability and the amount of contingency required to reduce
the overrun probability to an acceptable level. The software also enables the project
professional to explore alternate project scenarios quickly in order to determine the optimum
solution for virtually any economic decision, something which is often not practical or
feasible with manual methods. The software can provide an estimate of required contingency
to avoid overruns at any desired probability level. It can identify the required contingency for
each critical project item and it can identify those items within the estimate which contribute
most significantly to project risk, as well as those which afford the greatest areas of
opportunity.
Perhaps the most influential pioneer in the field of project risk analysis is Michael
Curran, president of Decision Sciences Corporation in St. Louis, Missouri. Curran (1976,
1988, 1989, 1998) has written extensively on project risk analysis and range estimating
approaches and developed the first major piece of software for project risk analysis, Range
Estimating Program for Personal Computers (REP/PC). Curran’s pioneering work began in
1964 and was prompted by an article in the Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1964 issue
entitled "Risk Analysis in Capital Investment" by David B. Hertz.
Curran recognized that, although Hertz never used the term, the article was about
Monte Carlo Simulation and how it could be used to address key issues in the problem of
capital planning. Monte Carlo Simulation techniques had come into prominence in the 1940s
when they were used in game theory and were applied to answer a problem in particle physics
in the Manhattan Project, i.e., the development of the atomic bomb. It wasn't long before other
scientists and engineers realized the power of Monte Carlo and began applying it many ways.
But in the Hertz article Curran saw that for the first time someone was suggesting its use in
business practice. This made so much sense to Curran that in 1968 he formed Decision
Sciences Corporation which has pioneered the field of project risk analysis in the United
States.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Business
Go
Page of 6