Instructions For Form Tir 05-15 - Transfers Of Prewritten Computer Software Sales And Use Tax Page 3

ADVERTISEMENT

Example 3: A business in Massachusetts purchases an enterprise license that allows the
purchaser to make copies of software (either from a master disk or downloaded copy) and those
copies will be concurrently available for use at the purchaser’s business locations in various
jurisdictions. The purchaser gives the seller a properly completed MPU form. For sales/use tax
purposes, part of the sales price will be apportioned to the other states where the purchaser is
using copies of the software.
A Multiple Points of Use Certificate may not be used for computer software received in person by
a business purchaser at a business location of the seller, such as a retail store. A Multiple Points
of Use Certificate also may not be used for software that is loaded on computer hardware prior to
sale; in that situation the sales tax sourcing rules for computer hardware determine the taxability
of the transaction, regardless of whether the price for the hardware and software are separately
stated.
In accordance with the authority in St. 2005, c. 163, § 34, the Department will promulgate
regulations on Multiple Points of Use Certificates and apportionment of sales or use tax to other
jurisdictions.
V. Treatment of Corporations as Engaged in Manufacturing Activity:
St. 2005, c. 163, §§ 27, 29 also amend G.L. c. 63, §§ 38C, 42B to provide that for purposes of
those provisions and G.L. c. 63, § 38, the development and sale of standardized computer
software shall be considered a manufacturing activity, without regard to the manner of delivery of
the software to the customer. These changes are effective for taxable years beginning on or after
January 1, 2006.
A corporation classified as a manufacturing corporation may use certain tax benefits outlined in
830 CMR 58.2.1(4). In addition, a corporation engaged in manufacturing but not having been so
classified may qualify for certain tax benefits described in 830 CMR 58.2.1(5). A corporation
engaged in manufacturing activity may also be subject to single sales factor income
apportionment for the corporate excise as provided by G.L. c. 63, § 38(l). Previously, corporations
engaged in the development and sales of prewritten software could only be treated as engaged in
manufacturing to the extent that software was delivered in a tangible medium.
/s/ Alan LeBovidge
Alan LeBovidge
Commissioner of Revenue
AL:MTF:jt
February 10, 2006
TIR 05-15
[1]
Prewritten software was called “canned software” in some of the Department’s prior public
written statements.
[2]
With respect to maintenance contracts sold before April 1, 2006, software vendors are
required to collect tax on invoices after April 1, 2006. For example, if a multiple year contract
that began in June, 2005 has payments due in June, 2006 and June, 2007, the vendor must
collect applicable tax on the payments due in June, 2006 and 2007.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Financial
Go
Page of 4