Joint Motion Regarding Continued Sealing - United States District Court Page 2
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
MARK “X” IN APPLICABLE
NONPARTY THAT
REASON WHY DOCUMENT SHOULD
DKT.
COLUMN
DESIGNATED DOC.
REMAIN SEALED OR BE UNSEALED
i
NO.
CONFIDENTIAL
(IF ANY)
Parties
Parties Agree
Parties
Agree Doc.
Doc. Should
Disagree
Should
Be Unsealed
Remain
Sealed
56
Unredacted copy of defendant
X
N/A
Redacted portions of brief contain
J. Smith’s brief in support of
information about FJB. FJB is a
motion for summary judgment
minor.
57
Plaintiff’s bank records from
X
N/A
Confidential financial records.
2012
58
Email from K. Nelson to R.
X
Acme Insurance
Email was designated as confidential
Jones dated 04/30/15
Agency
under a nondisclosure agreement
between defendant J. Smith and
nonparty Acme.
59
Unredacted portions of F.
X
N/A
Redacted portions of deposition
Mendoza’s deposition
were ordered sealed by Magistrate
Judge O’Malley on 03/01/16 [Docket
No. 48].
60
Email from plaintiff to J. Smith
X
N/A
Confidential designation withdrawn
by defendant J. Smith.
N/A
Plaintiff asserts document contains
71
Record from 2010 divorce action
X
involving plaintiff and her ex-
confidential information about her
husband
mental health; defendant contends
that information is not confidential
because it was disclosed by plaintiff
on Facebook in 2010.
2
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Legal