Special Verdict Form - Example Page 4

ADVERTISEMENT

least one of the following:
1.
Ajax departed from the standard of care of reasonably well-qualified
contractors in the design of the absorber towers for Units 1 and 2 of the removal system.
2.
Ajax failed to use ordinary care in the placement of the concrete for the
absorber tower walls in that the walls contained excessive honeycombs, voids and sandpockets.
Public Utility Company has the burden of proving, that such negligence was a cause of the
structural crack that appeared in the wall of G-H cell, and of resulting damages.
Ajax denies what Public Utility Company says about negligence and Ajax says that Public
Utility Company itself was negligent.
To establish negligence of Public Utility Company, Ajax has the burden of proving at least
one of the following:
1.
Operational personnel of Public Utility Company failed to use ordinary care
by allowing the absorbers to be filled with water beyond their designed capacity.
2.
In the design of the absorber towers, engineers for Public Utility Company
failed to use ordinary care when it rejected the Ajax recommendation for an overflow valve to
prevent inadvertent overfilling of the absorbers.
Ajax has the burden of proving that such negligence of Public Utility Company was a cause
of the structural crack which appeared in the wall of G-H cell.
Public Utility Company denies what Ajax says about such negligence.
To establish breach of express warranty on the part of Ajax, Public Utility Company has the
burden of proving Ajax affirmed in writing that the absorber walls would be constructed without
defects in material and workmanship and the walls, as constructed, contain substandard placement
of concrete including voids, honeycombs and sandpockets.
Public Utility Company has the burden of proving that a breach of express warranty was a
cause of the damages.
Ajax denies what Public Utility Company says about breach of express warranty and Ajax
says Public Utility Company failed to provide written notice of any breach of express warranty
within the time period specified in the contract.
Public Utility Company denies what Ajax says about failure to provide written notice of
breach of express warranty.
[As amended, effective January 1, 1987; November 1, 1991; March 1, 2005, as amended by
Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-021, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December
31, 2013.]

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 4