Small Claims Determination Form - New York Division Of Tax Appeals

ADVERTISEMENT

STATE OF NEW YORK
DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS
________________________________________________
In the Matter of the Petition
of
SMALL CLAIMS
JOHNNY DE LA CRUZ
DETERMINATION
DTA NO. 819807
for Revision of Determinations or for Refund of Sales and
Use Taxes under Articles 28 and 29 of the Tax Law for
the Period December 1, 1994 through February 29, 1996.
________________________________________________
th
Petitioner, Johnny De La Cruz, 155 5
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11217, filed a petition for revision of
determinations
or for refund of sales and use taxes under Articles 28 and 29 of the Tax Law for the period December 1, 1994
through February 29, 1996.
A small claims hearing was held before Gary R. Palmer, Presiding Officer, at the offices of the Division of Tax
Appeals, 641 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, on February 17, 2005 at 10:45 P.M. Because neither
party requested time for the filing of a brief, the three-month period for the issuance of this determination
commenced on the date of the hearing. Petitioner appeared by Leonard Fein, CPA. The Division of Taxation
appeared by Christopher C. O'Brien, Esq. (James A. Shiely and Richard B. Slovacek).
ISSUE
Whether the Division of Taxation properly treated the taxable sales and sales and use tax reported by petitioner
in his amended sales and use tax returns as petitioner's self-assessed sales and use tax liability for the periods at
issue.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. During the period from December 1, 1994 to February 29, 1996, petitioner operated a retail grocery store
th
under the name La Gran Parada at 155 5
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York. The merchandise sold by petitioner at
his store included both taxable and nontaxable items.
2. During the five sales tax quarters at issue petitioner timely filed quarterly sales and use tax returns with the
Division of Taxation ("Division") reporting gross and taxable sales and sales tax due for each quarter. Some of
the sales and use tax returns were filed without the payment of the tax reported due.
3. By letter dated July 22, 1998, the Division informed petitioner that an examination of purchase information
provided by "your beer, wine or liquor suppliers for calendar year 1995" was compared to petitioner's reported
taxable sales leading the Division to conclude petitioner may have underreported his taxable sales. In the letter,
the Division requested that petitioner review his purchases and sales for "this period" to determine if the correct
amount of taxable sales were reported. Lastly, the Division offered to provide amended return forms for
petitioner's use in correcting any errors and advised petitioner that it would waive any penalties on the tax
reported due on petitioner's amended returns.
4. On November 23, 1998 petitioner filed amended sales and use tax returns for the initial four sales tax quarters
at issue. The record does not include an amended sales and use tax return for the quarter ending February 29,
1996. In each amended return filed, petitioner reported a greater amount of taxable sales and sales tax due than

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Financial
Go
Page of 3