Professional Staff Evaluation Form Page 3

ADVERTISEMENT

PART B
(To Be Completed by Immediate Administrative Supervisor)
11.
Professional Performance
a.
Indicate your assessment of the faculty unit member's performance by explaining whether,
consistent with contemporary standards of the institution, the faculty unit member
exceeded, achieved or fell short of the level of performance reasonably expected in a(n)
(indicate rank) with like tenure status and comparable professional responsibilities and
resources. The explanation must indicate the consideration given to rank, experience and
tenure status, professional responsibilities and resources. Separate ratings must be given
for teaching, including separate mention of academic advisement, research and service
responsibilities. In each instance, based on the information supplied by the faculty unit
member, the supervisor must identify the specific activities, or lack thereof, that warrant the
rating.
b.
For all faculty unit members who serve on tenure track contracts or who hold rank below
that of professor, comment about progress towards achieving the levels of performance
that, in keeping with institutional standards, justify a recommendation for promotion to a
more senior rank or award of tenure. Comments must address each area of professional
responsibility.
c.
Where appropriate, include recommendations for augmentation monies and contract
renewal.
d. Response to the faculty unit member's major performance objectives for the next evaluation
period?

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Business
Go
Page of 4