Federal Register - 50 Cfr Part 17 Endangered And Threatened Wildlife And Plants - U.s. Fisn And Wildlife Service - 1980 Page 2

ADVERTISEMENT

Federal WQgister / Vol. 45. No. 171 / Tuesday,
September
2, 1980 / Proposed Rules
58169
.-
habitat and endanger8 the existence of
the species. The proposed determination
that Phacelia formosula is an
Endangered species, if finalized, would
extend to this plant the protection
provided by the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended. The Service seeks
comment on thie species.
DATES:
Comment8 from the public must
be received by November 3,198O.
Comments from the Governor of
Colorado must be received by December
1,1900.
ADDRESSES:
Comments and material8
concerning this proposal, preferably in
triplicate, should be sent to the Director
(FWS/OES), U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC. 20240. Comment8 and
materials received will be available for
public inspection by appointment during
normal business hours at the Service’s
Office of Endangered Species,
1000
North Glebe Road, Fifth Floor,
Arlington, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER
INFORMAllON
CONTACT:
Mr. John L Spinks, Jr., Chief, Office of
Endangered Species, Department of the
Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Washington, D.C. 2924Q,7Q3+?36277l.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:
Phacelia
formusufa was discovered in lQl8 and
described the following year. It is an
annual, herbaceous plant in the
waterleaf family (Hydrophyllaceae),
having a much-branched habit
glandular leaves, and attaining a height
of 1.5-2.2 dm. The violet flower8 are
borne in clusters measuring up to five
centimeters in length (Atwood, 1975).
Phacelia formosuia is known from only
one population in North Park, Jackson
County, Colorado, localized on a semi-
arid sandstone bluff open to direct
sunlight and winds. The area is sparsely
vegetated The continued existence of
this plant and its habitat are being
threatened by excessive motorcycle
traffic (Wiley, 1979). This de propose8
to determine Phacelia formosula to be
Endangered, which, if finalized, would
implement the protection provided by
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. The following paragraphs
further discuss the action8 to date
involving this plant, the threats to the
plant, and the effects of the proposed
action.
Background Section 12 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 directed
the Secretary of the Smithsonian
Institution to prepare a report on those
plants considered to be endangered,
threatened, or extinct. This report,
designated as House Document No. 94-
51, was presented to Congress on
January 9,1975. On July 1.1975, the
Director published a notice in the
Federal Register (40 FR 27823-27924) of
his acceptance of thia report as a
petition within the context of Section
4(c][2) of the Act, and of his intention
thereby to review the status of the plant
taxa named within. On June l&1978, the
Service published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register (41 FR 24523-24572) to
determine approximately 1,700 vascular
plant taxa to be Endangered species.
This list was assembled on the basis of
comment8 and data received by the .
Smithsonian Institution and the Service
in response to House Document No. Q4-
51 and the July 1,1975, Federal Register
publication. Phacelia formosula was
included in the July 1,1975, notice and
the June l&1976, proposal. General
comment8 on the 1976 proposal are
summarized in an April 26,1978, Federal
Register publication (43 FR 17QQQ-
17916.)
The Endangered Species Act
Amendment8 of 1978 (P.L 95-632)
required that all proposals over two-
years old be withdrawn. On December
10.1979, the Service published a notice
of the withdrawal of the June 16.1976,
proposal along with other proposals
which had expired (44 FR 70796-70797).
At this time, the Service has sufficient
new information to warrant reproposing
Phacelia formosula.
The Service has fuIly evaluated a
comprehensive status report on the
species. The Service has also consulted
a number of biologist8 with expertise in
this plant and knowledge of its habitat
and received very recent information on
its status.- On July 25,1930, Susan Tabar.
a professor of botany at The Colorado
College and employed this summer by
the Bureau of Land Management,
conducted a field survey of the plant’s
habitat. Despite the fact that conditions
were excellent for the plant this growing
season, she found only
117 mature
specimens and 3 seedlings in four small
patches.
This
information indicate8 that
Phacelia formosula is in danger of
extinction.
The Department has determined that
this is not a significant rule and does not
require the preparation of a regulatory
analysis under Executive Order 12044
and 43 CFR Part 14.
Summarv of Factor8 Affectins the
Species: Sibsection 4(a) of the -
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) states that the Secretary of the
Interior shall determine whether any
species is an Endangered specie8 or a
Threatened species due to one or more
of the five factor8 described in that
subsection. These factors and their
application to Phacelia formosula
Osterhout are as follows:
1. Present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or mnge-Phacelia
formosuia
has been known from only one location
near Walden in Jackson County,
Colorado, since its discovery in 1918. At
one time, the species was thought to
occur also in Grand County, but that
specimen is now considered a
misidentification. The location of
Phacelia formosula is a sandstone bluff
above the Michigan River. The
population occupies about Y4 mile of the
bluff. In
1979
there were about ten adult
plants and a few dozen seedlings; in
1980, in response to a particularly wet
spring, there were 117 mature plants and
three seedlings clustered in about four
patches. Botanist8 have searched for
other suitable habitat without success.
Ownership of this habitat is shared by
Jackson County and the Brownlee Cattle
Company. Dr. N. Duane Atwood, a
botanist with the U.S. Forest Service,
1
noted that in 1969 there were 30 to 40
mature individuals of Phacefia
formosula in this area and a possible
1
!
location of a second population nearby.
,
Plants at this second location are now
totally absent. The area at that time also
suffered from motorcycle activity.
i
The limited habitat of this species is
being destroyed through heavy use by
f
off-road motorcyclists on the county-
owned land. Local motorcycle trails,
which are restricted to the bluff. run
through the population. This activity is
continuing at present. This sparsely
vegetated hillside offers no obstacle to
motorcyclists. Plants can be dislodged
or crushed and the fragile habitat is
subject to erosion from continual
disturbance. Once disturbed, these
fragile plant communities take many
years to recover.
2. Overutilization for commerical,
sporting, scientific, or educational
purposes. Not applicable to this species.
3. Disease orpredation (including
grazing)--Grazing has occurred on the
species’ habitat. This grazing does not
appear to threaten the species.
4. The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms-There
currently exist no State or Federal laws
protecting this specie8 or its habitat. The
Endangered Species Act offers
possibilities for protection of this
species.
5. Other natumi or man-made factors
affecting its continued existence-Any
human pressure on this species may
exaggerate the possibility of small
population8 going extinct through
natural population fluctuations.
Reproductive success of the present
population is reported as very poor, with
low vigor. Vandalism, facilitated by
expanding loca1 awareness of the plant
and its habitat, could destroy the
species.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 4