2004 Annual Report - Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative - U.s. Department Of Justice Page 13

ADVERTISEMENT

Providing input from the local and state law
Supported the development of a recommended
l
l
enforcement community in their efforts to develop
curriculum for NCISP chief executive-level training
and share criminal intelligence.
classification, which includes information regarding
NCISP, intelligence-led policing, basic intelligence,
Recommending a framework for implementing
l
legal and privacy issues, and available resources.
and ensuring the longevity of the standards-
based intelligence plan, training and technology
Supported the development of a recommended
l
coordination, outreach and education, and
curriculum for educating criminal justice and
resource coordination.
homeland security communities regarding the
tenets of NCISP.
Advising the U.S. Attorney General on the best use
l
of criminal intelligence to keep the Nation safe.
G
p
i
Q
lobAl
RivAcY AnD
nfoRmAtion
uAlitY
W
G
Colonel Kenneth Bouche, Illinois State Police and
oRkinG
Roup
GIWG chair, and Chief Joseph Polisar, Garden Grove,
GPIQWG comprises of privacy experts from across
California, Police Department, serve as cochairs of
the justice landscape (including victims’ services)
CICC, which held its inaugural meeting on June 24,
committed to balancing the need for data exchange—
2004, in Washington, DC.
spotlighted in the post-9/11 environment—with
vigorous protection of individuals’ constitutional rights.
With the support and guidance of BJA, and through
In 2004, GPIQWG members finalized Privacy and
frequent collaboration with the nation’s premier law
Information Quality Policy Development for the Justice
enforcement agencies and organizations, the following
Decision Maker
(hereafter “Privacy Policy Paper” or
19
initiatives
were accomplished in 2004:
18
“Paper I”) and completed substantial drafting on the
Collaborated with IALEIA to publish the resource
l
Privacy Policy Development Workbook (“Workbook”),
booklet Law Enforcement Analytic Standards,
an indepth, hands-on companion resource to Paper
which contains 25 standards—7 for analysts and
I. Both documents draw on the fundamental work
18 for analytic products.
accomplished by the Privacy Guideline for Justice
Information Systems.
GAC, through GPIQWG,
Developed a preliminary report containing
20
l
coordinated the production of this previous manual.
recommended standards, guidelines, and model
policies for the intelligence component of fusion
p
i
Q
p
D
RivAcY AnD
nfoRmAtion
uAlitY
olicY
evelopment
centers.
J
D
foR the
uStice
eciSionmAkeR
Helped develop guidelines to assist local and
l
Described as “beneficial reading for any justice
state agencies in the collection, analysis, and
decisionmaker,” the Privacy Policy Paper is broad
dissemination of terrorism-related intelligence
in scope. Privacy policy development is deemed a
in collaboration with the Homeland Security
“priority” for organizations that:
Advisory Council (HSAC), Prevention and
Information Sharing Working Group.
1. Control, disclose, or provide access to information
to outside persons or agencies.
Collaborated with LEIU on the development
l
of the LEIU Audit Checklist, which assists law
2. Contain data in its information system(s)
enforcement executives in conducting a review of
connected to or shared with other information
their agency’s criminal intelligence function.
systems or agencies.
Recommended local and state representatives to
3. Collect, use, or provide access to “personally
l
assist with the Presidential Executive Order 13356
identifiable information.”
Implementation Plan. These representatives
The publication underscores the need to craft privacy
coordinate all DHS/DOJ provision of local
policy as an integral part of justice information
and state law enforcement input into the
sharing—in the initial stages, not as an afterthought,
Implementation Plan.
as is often the case. Periodic review of existing
In collaboration with a subgroup of the DOJ
l
policies is also essential. The easy-to-read booklet
Counter-Terrorism Training Coordination
highlights a critical need and provides a systematic
Working Group (CTTWG), recommended
approach for privacy policy development “from
minimum training standards for the six training
concept to action” and addresses the following:
classifications outlined in NCISP.
GAC 2004 Annual Report to the U.S. Attorney General
11

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal