Publication 1212 - List Of Original Issue Discount Instruments - Department Of Treasury - 2002 Page 9

ADVERTISEMENT

Debt Instruments
1984, through April 30, 1985, reduced for the
sition premium under this method, multiply the
acquisition premium, is figured as follows.
Issued After 1984
daily OID by the following fraction.
1) Daily OID on date of purchase
If you hold debt instruments issued after 1984,
The numerator is the acquisition premium.
(2nd accrual period) . . . . . . . . . . . . $.32274
you must report part of the discount in gross
The denominator is the total OID remain-
income each year that you own the instruments.
2) Acquisition premium . . .
$1,897.17
ing for the instrument after your purchase
You must include the OID in gross income
3) Total days from purchase
date.
whether or not you hold the instrument as a
date to maturity date [(365
capital asset. Your basis in the instrument is
× 19 years) + 4 days for
increased by the OID you include in income. For
leap years] . . . . . . . . .
6,939
Example 14. Assume the same facts as in
information about showing the correct OID on
Example 9, except that you bought the bond for
4) Line 2 ÷ line 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $.27341
your tax return, see How To Report OID, earlier.
$99,000 on August 1, 2002, after its original
Form 1099 – OID. You should receive a Form
issue on August 1, 1983. In this case, you paid
5) Daily OID reduced for the
acquisition premium. Line 1 − line 4 $.04933
1099 – OID showing OID for the part of 2002 you
more for the bond than its $98,637.71 adjusted
held the bond. However, if you paid an acquisi-
issue price ($90,000 + $8,637.71 accrued OID).
The OID you would have included in income
tion premium, you may need to refigure the OID
You paid $362.29 ($99,000 − $98,637.71) ac-
for 1984 is $12.09 ($.04933 × 245 days).
to report on your tax return. See Figuring OID
Assuming you still owned the bond in 2002,
quisition premium. The daily OID for the accrual
using the constant yield method and Reduction
you would have reduced the total OID for each
period August 1, 2002, to July 31, 2003, reduced
for acquisition premium, later.
year (as determined in Example 10) by the allo-
for the acquisition premium, is figured as fol-
You may also need to refigure the OID for a
cable portion of the acquisition premium for that
lows:
contingent payment or inflation-indexed debt in-
year. You would have included the following
strument on which the amount reported on Form
amounts of OID in income.
1) Daily OID on date of purchase
1099 – OID is inaccurate. See Contingent Pay-
(20th accrual period) . . . . . . . . .
$3.72704*
ment Debt Instruments or Inflation-Indexed Debt
Year
OID
Instruments, later.
2) Acquisition premium . . . $362.29
1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 29.52
Form 1099 – OID not received. If you held an
1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48.35
3) Total OID remaining after
OID instrument in 2002 but did not receive a
purchase date ($10,000 −
1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69.60
Form 1099 – OID, refer to Section I – B later in
1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
94.67
$8,637.71) . . . . . . . . . . 1,362.29
this publication. The OID listed is for each
1989 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
122.92
4) Line 2 ÷ line 3 . . . . . . .
$1,000 of redemption price. You must adjust the
1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
155.35
0.26594
1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
191.94
listed amount if your debt instrument has a dif-
5) Line 1 × line 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
235.33
0.99117
ferent principal amount. For example, if you
1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
283.80
have an instrument with a $500 principal
1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
339.65
6) Daily OID reduced for the
amount, use one-half the listed amount to figure
acquisition premium. Line 1 −
1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
402.66
your OID.
1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
477.59
line 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2.73587
Use the OID shown in Section I – B for the
1997 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
560.88
calendar year if you held the instrument the
* As shown in Example 9.
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
657.06
entire year. (If your instrument is not listed in
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
765.59
The total OID to include in income for 2002
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
894.85
Section I – B, consult the issuer for information
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,038.08
(August 1 – December 31) is $418.59
about the issue price, the yield to maturity, and
($2.73587 × 153 days).
the OID that accrued for 2002.) If you did not
If you held the bond all of 2002, reduce the
hold the debt instrument the entire year, figure
total OID for that year, $1,303.52 (as determined
If you hold the bond until maturity in 2003,
your OID as follows.
in Example 10), by the allocable part of the
multiply the total OID for the year by 0.99117
acquisition premium for 2002, $99.79 ($.27341
1) Look up the daily OID for the first 2002
and subtract the result from the total OID. The
× 365 days). The difference, $1,203.73, is the
accrual period in which you held the instru-
reduced amount is the total OID to be included in
total OID to include in income for 2002.
ment. (See Accrual period under Figuring
income for 2003.
OID using the constant yield method,
Example 12. Assume the same facts as in
Using Section I – A to figure accumulated
later.)
Example 11, except that you bought the bond for
OID. If you bought your corporate debt instru-
$90,102.83. In this case, you bought the bond
2) Multiply the daily OID by the number of
ment in 2002 or 2003 and it is listed in Section
for an amount equal to the original issue price
days in 2002 you held the instrument dur-
I – A, you can figure the accumulated OID to the
plus accumulated OID. Therefore, you did not
ing that accrual period.
date of purchase by adding the following
pay an acquisition premium. You would have
3) Repeat (1) and (2) for any remaining 2002
included $79.07 ($.32274 × 245 days) in income
amounts.
accrual periods in which you held the in-
for 1984. For the remaining years, you would
strument.
have included the amounts figured in Example
1) The amount from the “Total OID to Janu-
4) Add the results of (2) and (3). This is the
10.
ary 1, 2002” column for your debt instru-
OID to include in income for 2002, unless
ment.
Example 13. Assume the same facts as in
you paid an acquisition premium. (The re-
2) The OID from January 1, 2002, to the date
Example 11, except that you bought the bond for
duction for acquisition premium is dis-
of purchase, figured as follows.
$89,500. You did not pay an acquisition pre-
cussed later.)
mium because your cost was less than the ad-
a) Multiply the daily OID for the first ac-
justed issue price. You must include in income
Tax-exempt bond. If you own a tax-exempt
crual period in 2002 by the number of
each year the amounts of OID figured in Exam-
bond, figure your basis in the bond by adding to
days from January 1 to the date of
ple 12. The bonds have market discount, which
your cost the OID you would have included in
purchase, or the end of the accrual pe-
must be reported under the rules explained in
income if the bond had been taxable. You need
riod if the instrument was purchased in
chapter 1 of Publication 550.
to make this adjustment to determine if you have
the second or third accrual period.
a gain or loss on a later disposition of the bond.
Reduction for acquisition premium on debt
Use the rules that follow to determine your OID.
instruments purchased after July 18, 1984.
b) Multiply the daily OID for each subse-
If you bought the debt instrument at an acquisi-
Figuring OID using the constant yield
quent accrual period by the number of
tion premium after July 18, 1984, figure the OID
method. This discussion shows how to figure
days in the period to the date of
includible in income by reducing the daily OID by
OID on debt instruments issued after 1984 using
purchase or the end of the accrual pe-
the daily acquisition premium. However, the
a constant yield method. (The special rules that
riod, whichever applies.
method of figuring the daily acquisition premium
apply to contingent payment debt instruments
c) Add the amounts figured in (2a) and
is different from the method described in the
and inflation-indexed debt instruments are ex-
preceding discussion. To figure the daily acqui-
(2b).
plained later.) OID is allocated over the life of the
Page 9

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Financial