Joint Request To Charge
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4Print
SAMPLE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
_____________________ DIVISION
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
Civil Action No. ________________
)
Defendant
)
)
J
R
C
N
. ____
OINT
EQUEST TO
HARGE
O
The plaintiff's claim in this case is based upon three alternative theories: (1) negligence, (2) strict
liability, and (3) breach of warranty. The plaintiff is not required to prove all three of these theories in
order for him to recover. Proof of his claim under any one of these theories would enable you to find
that he is entitled to a verdict in his favor.
Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc., 462 S.E.2d 321 (S.C. Ct.
App. 1995).
Plaintiff agrees: _______
Defendant agrees:
_______
SAMPLE
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Legal