Factor
Over-All
Technical
Rating Factors and Bonus Points
Discipline
(Points) Rating
Rating
(5)
4.
Leveraging Resources
(0)
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
PM
a.
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals 5% or less of the capital advance amount as determined by HUD,
OR
(
)
PM
b.
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
1
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals between 6% and 10% of the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD, OR
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
(2)
PM
c.
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals between 11% and 15% of the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD, OR
(3)
PM
d.
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals between 16% and 20% of the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD, OR
PM
e.
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
(4)
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals between 21% and 25% of the capital advance amount as
determined by HUD, OR
PM
f.
The extent to which the Sponsor has secured general support and/or written evidence of fi rm
(5)
commitments towards the development and operation of the proposed project from other funding
sources where the dollar value totals over 25% of the capital advance amount as determined by
HUD.
(12)
5.
Achieving Results and Program Evaluation
PM
a. (1)
The extent to which the services/activities identifi ed in the Logic Model are consistent with the
(3)
information provided in the application as well as the extent to which the sponsor demonstrates full
understanding of the activities that must be accomplished in order to develop the project within the
required timeframe.
PM
a. (2)
The extent to which the outcomes identifi ed in the Logic Model are consistent with the services/
(3)
activities that must be accomplished in order to get the project to initial closing within the 18-month
fund reservation period, completion of the project, and to fi nal closing.
PM
a. (3)
The extent to which the projected measures show a realistic understanding of the development
(3)
process resulting in a timely initial closing, start of construction, and fi nal closing.
PM
a. (4)
The extent to which the evaluation tools selected in the Logic Model are consistent with the project
(1)
described.
PM
b.
The extent to which past performance evidences that the proposed project will result in the timely
(2)
development of the project.
(100)
Total Base Points
(2)
Bonus Points
CPD
Location of proposed site in an RC/EZ/EC-II area.
(102)
Base Points plus Bonus Points
HUD Offi ce Comments:
Printed Name & Signature & Phone Number of Project Manager & Date:
X
Printed Name & Signature & Phone Number of Supervisory Project Manager & Date
X
The Signatori
rm with which the
S
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page 3 of 4
form HUD-9883-CA (8/2007)
ref. Handbook 4571.2 Rev-1