Form Nh.ib-2883-P Draft - Request For Reassignment - New Hampshire Circuit Court Page 3

ADVERTISEMENT

CaseName=------------------------------------------------------------------
CaseNumber: ______________________________________________________________ ___
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT
7.
Do you knbw of any reason why the Presiding Judge of the Trust Docket would be disqualified
from this case?
D
Yes
D
No. if yes, explain why.
"'-·:.·
8.
Nature of case (Limit one page double-spaced; please
attap~):::.:N>·~
9.
Nature of complexity (Limit five pages double spaced;,p[E?qse attach).
~Y
:2v _. .
v
Each request for reassignment will be
administratiY'~Jyl'r~viewed
for
purpo~~~·,g~determining
whether reassignment to the Trust Docket is ap.~,t;,~~~iate based on the unique c§mplexities of
each case. Please describe the complexities P'r~~ent in this cc:t9~making it approg,ri?tefor
transfer.
<'i~f~~~';;
. ,( ::· ':',
· ;/,
The following criteria, although not intended to be
eif~~~
0
~s:)jJ,
oiling or fully describing the nature
of cases appropriate for
reassignm~.
· dicate certain'fg§fcfrs that might make a case complex
and appropriate for reassignment to
·u
t Docket.
"' ' " :{ ·
a. Multiple Issues and Complexity
'"''"~l:';~~faised'tnl~bte
multiple layers of
complexity? Does the instrumen · · ·
· sue i'ncUilit'le:novel, affi'bjguous, or complicated
JAfJ:f/f%-i/;X:::.{0,J)y:-··.....
''"o/i?~f#·
provisions? Is the)
[lclear, co . ;Jj:9at
t•·;p,is''tf;}~£~;;;;~
. . . chhice of law controversy?
.<
1 .
1~:~t.··:
\fzWfZt·
Y
'·'"<~::x~ifY?xa:{&Y
b. Multitude of lnstlium
<af?lssue- Do
/ft
case involve' interpretation of multiple types of
probate docHt!l~tffs?
·~
c. Number
ot1~~7~ies-
Does '
case
inv~,~~~J·,!]lultiple
parties or parties with competing or
differing
inter~.$,'t~?
Are ttt
&.
:Ci·.{lUrnber
of
1
q~editors
with competing preferences for estate
as:.;;~;.?.>
.
+·;~·~~;;i'•;&~~Yl;h]'J~5~X:i'
1
.. ·· .•. ····.··•· ..
<>
.:}i"•:;;.
d.
~c}tei-:ltiiii~C[a,x
lmplicati0ns- Does theca
e
involve complicated tax questions or does the
)i~§LifcomeTmpJi~qte va'rr§;W~.tax consequences?
~:.(·Projected Len~tgofTriaf~(Po
the parties project a multi-day trial as opposed to only a few
· ·,hours?
·
.:c ·
· •
f.
MUltiple Forums-
Are
the parties involved in related litigation in other Circuit Court
divlst?n.~ that are bes(consolidated into one matter? Does resolution of the case affect, or
is
it~~~f~~ffected
by;;ililgation in the Superior Court or Federal Court?
g.
Urgenc~·':btAdjudi6ktion-
Is there a critical need for fast resolution?
;,··
)\;~,..;,
"<
h. Efficiency .....
G~hthe
case be more efficiently resolved in a specialized docket?
Separately number each factor you believe qualifies this case for reassignment to the Trust
Docket and for each factor, explain why the criteria above or other criteria you believe should apply,
support reassignment.
Do not attach any other document to this Request for Reassignment. If you want specific
pleadings or documents considered in the administrative review, refer to them by name, date of
submission to the current court, and docket entry number.
NH.IR-?RR::l-P fO::l/?!i/?014\

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 4