2. Performance Scoring Methodology
The following performance scoring methodology is based on the acceptable standard of performance by
the Contractor in meeting the requirements of the contract.
Definition of Gradings
Grading
Definition
Rating*
Superior
Standard well above the acceptable standard of performance
10
Good
Standard often exceeds the acceptable standard of performance
7
Acceptable
Meets the acceptable standard of performance required by the
5
contract
Marginal
Mostly meets the acceptable standard of performance but has some
3
weakness.
Unsatisfactory
Well below the acceptable standard of performance
0
The CPR performance score for a report on a Contractor on a contract is based on the weighted ratings
from the report.
Example of weighted performance from a report
Evaluation Criteria
Weight
Grading
Rating
Weighted
Max. possible
Rating
weighted rating
(a) x (b)
(a) x 10
(a)
(b)
Time management
5
Good
7
35
50
Standard of work
5
Acceptable
5
25
50
Quality mgmt systems
2
Acceptable
5
10
20
Personnel
3
Good
7
21
30
Subcontractors etc
3
Good
7
21
30
Contract admin
3
Good
7
21
30
Co-operative relations
3
Good
7
21
30
OH&S
5
Acceptable
5
25
50
Industrial relations
3
Good
7
21
30
Environmental mgmt
4
Good
7
28
40
Training management
3
Good
7
21
30
Contractor’s design
3
Good
7
21
30
Social/Indigenous/
5
Good
7
35
50
Aboriginal/Other
Participation
305
470
Totals
(c)
(d)
CPR score = 100 x (c)/(d) = 100 x (305/470) = 64.9%
NPS Contractor Performance Report December 2010
Page 6 of 12