Judging Score Card Template (Page 2 of 4) in pdf

Judge’s Name: __________________________________ Team Letter _________

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Fair

Below Average

Needs Improvement

Score

5 points

4 points

3 Points

2 Points

1 Point

Implementation

• Very well considered,

• A reasonable timeline is

• Timeline is provided but not

• No timeline provided

• No timeline mentioned

Possible 20 pts

realistic timeline for

offered

entirely realistic, given the

• Action plan misses

• Action plan is not aligned

implementation

• Action plan considered

scope of the case

identifying needed resources

with resources available

• Comprehensive action plan

needed resources

• Plan only considers some

• Costs are not justified

• No consideration of costs

defines necessary resources

• Costs are estimated, with

needed resources, others are

• Risks are vaguely considered,

• Risks are not discussed

X 4 =

• Sound estimation of

some attempt at justification

missed

but no action is discussed to

• No evaluation method is

associated costs is presented

• Risks are identified and there

• Costs are stated, but not

mitigate them

provided

• Risks are clearly identified

is a plan to mitigate them

adequately justified

• Inadequate evaluation

• Contingency plans not

_________

and considered, with

• An evaluation plan is place

• Risks are identified but the

method is described

considered

description of a realistic plan

• There is mention of possible

plan does not fully address

• No contingency plans

to mitigate

contingency plans, but nothing

them

evident

• Evaluation method to

substantial is described

• Evaluation method is

determine effectiveness of

described but is confusing or

plan is well thought-out and

may be prohibitive

explained

• No contingency plans are

• Plan B clearly identified and

defined

feasible, should Plan A fail

Presentation

• Team was confident in their

• In general the team was

• The team displayed some

• Team members struggled

• Team rarely made eye

Delivery

delivery, made excellent eye

poised and confident and did

poise, however there was

with nervousness and

contact and were nervous

Possible 20 pts

contact and maintained poise

use eye contact well

evidence of nervousness

disorganization at points

and/or disorganized

• All team members

• Contribution by team

• Most team members

during the presentation

throughout

contributed equally to the

members was, in general,

presented/contributed

• Not all team members

• One team member carried

X 4 =

presentation

fairly distributed

• While there were some

contributed to the

almost all of the presentation

• Presenters spoke clearly,

• Presenters spoke clearly with

issues with pacing, the team

presentation

• Voice clarity, volume and

with effective volume, pace

good volume, pace and tone

spoke clearly

• There were some issues with

pacing made the presentation

_________

and tone

• Body language/movement

• Limited emphasis on

volume, voice clarity and

difficult to follow

• Body language/movement

was appropriate to engage

movement or body language

pacing

• Body language and

worked well to engage

audience

to engage the audience

• Body language and

movement were distracting for

audience

• For the most part, the team

• Some members were off-

movement became distracting

audiences

• No signs that presenters

was off-script

script, some read from the

in some instances

• Team seemed overall

were reading from a script

script

• Extra time was taken for

unprepared and lost their train

• Presentation was very

team members to get

of thought during the

engaging and interesting to

organized or “re-set”

presentation

observe

HRC West Judging Template 2017

Judging Score Card Template Page 2

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories