Joint Request To Charge Page 3
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
John Doe,
)
C/A No. 3:06-12345-MBS
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
JOINT REQUEST TO CHARGE
-vs-
)
NO.
)
Richard Roe,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
____________________________________)
The plaintiff’s claim in this case is based upon three alternative theories: (1) negligence,
(2) strict liability, and (3) breach of warranty. The plaintiff is not required to prove all three of
these theories in order for him to recover. Proof of his claim under any one of these theories
would enable you to find that he is entitled to a verdict in his favor.
Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc., 462 S.E.2d 321 (S.C. Ct.
App. 1995).
Plaintiff agrees:
Defendant agrees:
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Legal