Pastor Evaluation printable pdf download

PASTOR EVALUATION

Note 1: This sample evaluation focuses on the performance of the pastor, but it aims to evaluate

performance based on previously established priorities . In addition, the performance criteria

are weighted. Thus, a “needs improvement” in a category with a low priority is not of as much

concern as a “needs improvement” in a high priority category.

Evaluate the pastor in the following categories, circling the appropriate level of performance.

Based on the requirements of the job, the pastor:

Exceeds: Performs most duties in a superior manner. Takes on many assignments using

their own initiative and contributes more than is expected of the position.

Meets: Performs assigned duties in an acceptable manner and meets requirements of the

position.

Needs Improvement: Performs duties at a less than acceptable level, needs

improvement.

Note 2: The priority rankings are based on the church’s goals for the performance year being

evaluated.

The CPC Goals for 2005 are:

 Stabilization activities – the basics – sermons, member needs, standard programs

 Member contact – serving our current members

 Growth – identifying alternatives and strategies for growth

 Continuing process to call a pastor – Mission study committee

Note 3: Each rating is followed by a comments section, giving the evaluator the opportunity to

describe specific successes and concerns. The evaluator is also encouraged to keep in mind

connections between a) the category (e.g., “Administrative Leadership”); b) the category’s

priority ranking (A, B, or C); and c) the rating (e.g., “Exceeds Expectations”) assigned to that

category.

Provide comments concerning the 2005 performance and provide specifics wherever possible.

Highlight areas of exceptional effort, those that need improvement and/or change, and any

particular focus areas for the upcoming year. Note the overall priority of each category (with A

being high and C being low) for the particular category. A criterion or category assigned a high

priority A should have more activity than a C category.

1. Worship development and leadership - Develops liturgy (forms, choice of hymns, prayers,

etc.) that is appropriate to the congregation and community. Conducts meaningful prayers of the

people. Administers sacraments effectively. Leads worship committee and program staff to

consider changes and innovations, such as whether a “contemporary” worship service should be

established and format suggestions.

This sample evaluation was adapted from a form generously provided by the Reverend Bob Harris, consultant and former

interim pastor at Christ Presbyterian Church, Fairfax, VA.

Pastor Evaluation