Draft Final Report Acwa-08-05 - Continuation Of Lower Nushagak River Fecal Coliform And Water Quality Assessment - Alaska Department Of Environmental Conservation - 2008 Page 13

ADVERTISEMENT

DRAFT Final Report ACWA-08-05
8 October 2008
Between 1979 and 1986, the USGS recorded turbidity in the lower Nushagak River at Ekwok on 36
separate occasions (USGS, 2008). The May 2008 turbidity levels in the lower Nushagak River, on
average, showed a three-fold increase from the highest turbidity reading of 8.1 NTUs on June 6, 1985 by
the USGS over that time period (Table A1). The elevated turbidity in the river in May, accompanied with
the spike in fecal coliform concentrations suggest that more intensive monitoring of the river
immediately following breakup may be warranted.
It is also interesting to note that the sampling period when water quality was at its lowest did not
correspond with one of the assumptions in our study design, which was that water quality would decline
during peak human activity on the river (in August, September and June). During those times, fecal
coliform concentrations in the lower Nushagak were relatively low as compared to the May sampling
event, although they were not as low as they were in October, when recreational activities on the river
had waned for the year. Again, the magnitude of the May spike in turbidity and corresponding spike in
fecal coliform concentrations may warrant further investigation.
Recommendations for future monitoring
The results of this study add additional data to a growing water quality data set on the lower Nushagak
River. In light of the results of this latest study, we make the following recommendations for future
monitoring efforts:
1) Investigate the duration and intensity of the spike in turbidity and fecal coliform concentrations
in the lower Nushagak River after breakup. Infrequent sampling to date has painted a hazy
picture of the temporal changes in water quality in the river. More concentrated sampling
efforts during times when conditions are most degraded may help to determine the causes of
degradation.
2) Continue to involve local monitors and guides in water quality monitoring. These folks have
developed expertise in collecting data and have invaluable knowledge of the region. They have
the largest vested interest in monitoring Nushagak River water quality, as the river is the
lifeblood of their communities.
3) Collection of bacteriological information, in addition to fecal coliform, to help determine the
source(s) of the fecal bacteria in the river. Fecal coliform has many sources, including all warm-
blooded wildlife, whereas E. coli may prove to be a better estimator of human sources of fecal
bacteria in a waterbody.
Page 13

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal