Financial Proposal Standard Forms - Punjab Procurement Regulatory Authority Page 35
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36Number of Similar Assignments
The number of similar projects (N) listed on the individual’s CV for the past 5 or 10 years (as
decided by the Competent Authority) is compared with a base value (TS) decided by the
Competent Authority.
Sub‐component score = N/Ts x 25%
Value of Largest Similar Assignment
The value of the largest similar assignment listed on the individual’s CV for the past 5 or 10
years (as decided by the Competent Authority) is compared to the present assignment. The
grading is then done according to the following table:
Value in
Grade (G)
Comparison to
past assignments
80%+
100%
50%-80%
65%
<50%
30%
Sub‐component score = G of 15%
Role in Similar Assignments
The role of the individual in previous similar assignments listed on his/her CV is compared to
the proposed role in the present assignment. The grading is then done according to the
following table:
Role in Similar Projects
Grade (G)
2 or More
1
Exactly Similar
100
65%
Support Role
65
42.25%
to Similar
Slightly
30
19.5%
Similar
Time Spent in Similar Assignments
Time spent by the individual on similar projects in man‐months (N) will be compared with the
total number of possible man‐months in the past 5 years, i.e. 60 months.
Sub‐component score = N/60 x 30%
Page 2 of 3
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Legal