Lesson
4
Objectives:
SWBAT
g ive
c onstructive
v erbal
f eedback
o n
a
p eer’s
w riting.
Materials:
Writing
L etters
C hecklist
Students’
w orking
d rafts
Activities:
( 40
m inutes
t otal)
Begin
w ith
2 0
m inutes
o f
f ree
w riting
t ime
f or
s tudents
t o
f inish
t heir
l etter
d rafts.
Then,
c all
s tudents
t o
t he
c arpet.
R eview
t he
w riting
p rocess
o utlined
i n
W rite
O n
Track
b y
s howing
p ages
9 6-‐97,
t hen
r eread
t he
R evising
s ection
t o
t he
c lass.
P ass
o ut
t he
Writing
L etters
C hecklist
a nd
i nstruct
s tudents
t o
u se
i t
t o
g uide
t heir
w riting
p rocess
a fter
writing
t heir
f irst
c omplete
d raft.
E xplain
t hat
t he
c hecklist
w ill
b e
u sed
a s
a
r ubric
w hen
I
look
a t
t heir
f inal
d rafts.
( 5
m in)
Transition
b y
s aying
t hat
w e
a ll
w ork
t o
r evise
o ur
o wn
w riting,
b ut
s ometimes
other
p eople
c an
s ee
w ays
t o
m ake
o ur
w riting
b etter
t hat
w e
d on’t
s ee
o urselves—
“ That’s
why
M rs.
P osey
a nd
I
w alk
a round
a nd
t alk
w ith
e ach
o f
y ou
a bout
y our
w riting.
H ave
y ou
ever
n oticed
h ow
w e
a sk
q uestions
a nd
g ive
s uggestions?
N ow
i t’s
y our
t urn
t o
d o
t hat.”
Explain
t hat
w e
w ill
b e
d oing
s omething
c alled
‘ peer
c onferencing,’
w hich
j ust
m eans
g iving
your
p artner
a dvice
a bout
h ow
t o
m ake
t heir
w riting
b etter.
S tudents
s hould
u se
t he
Writing
L etters
c hecklist
f or
R evising
q uestions
t o
l ook
f or
w ays
t o
i mprove
f riendly
l etters.
(3
m in)
Display
t he
s ample
f riendly
l etter
f rom
W orksheet
p age
7 4,
a bsent
s ome
o f
t he
f ive
parts,
a nd
a sk
s tudents
f or
t heir
s uggestions
b ased
o n
t he
q uestions
i n
t he
W riting
L etters
Checklist.
M ake
n otes
a bout
t he
m issing
p arts
o n
t he
l etter
i tself,
b ut
w rite
s tudent
comments
r egarding
c larity
a nd
d etails
b elow
t he
l etter.
E ncourage
s tudents
t o
b e
k ind
and
s pecific
i n
t heir
f eedback
a nd
p raise
r esponses
t hat
w ould
b e
i deal
i n
a
c onference.
Model
h ow
t he
w riter
s hould
r espond:
b y
a sking
c larifying
q uestions
a bout
t he
o ther
person’s
s uggestions,
b y
w riting
d own
w hat
t hey
s uggest,
a nd
b y
l istening
w ith
a n
o pen
mind.
N ext,
d isplay
a
b lank
l ist
a nd
a sk
s tudents
t o
g enerate
s ome
r ules
w e
c an
a ll
l ive
b y
when
c onferencing
w ith
o ur
p eers.
W rite
d own
t he
r ules
t hat
m ost
s tudents
a gree
t o
( by
show
o f
h ands).
( 15
m in)
With
t ime,
l et
s tudents
w ho
h aven’t
f inished
c ontinue
w ork
o n
t heir
d rafts
a nd
assign
s tudents
w ho
h ave
t o
p artners
f or
p eer
c onferencing.
M onitor
c onferences
c losely
and
g ive
g uidance.
Follow-‐Up:
T urn
t he
c onferencing
r ules
i nto
a
p oster
a nd
p ost
a bove
t he
c ubbies.