Basic Impact Assessment At Project Level Page 28
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36Table 2:
Comparative strengths and weaknesses of different methods
Method
Surveys
Rapid
Participant
Case
Participatory
Criteria
appraisal
observation
studies
Learning and
Action
1. Coverage
(scale of
High
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
applicability
2. Represent-
High
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
ativeness
3. Ease of data
standardisation,
High
Medium
Medium or Low
Low
Medium or low
aggregation and
synthesis (e.g.
quantification)
4. Ability to
isolate and
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
measure non-
project causes of
change
5. Ability to cope
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
with the
attribution
problem
6. Ability to
Low
High
High
High
High
capture
qualitative
information
7. Ability to
Low
High
High
Medium
High
capture
causal processes
8. Ability to
Minimal
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
understand
complex
processes (e.g..
institution
building)
9. Ability to
Low
High
Very high
Medium
High
capture
diversity of
perceptions
28
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Privacy Impact Assessment Update For The Advance Passenger Information System (apis) - U.s. Department Of Homeland Security - 2013
Legal
Template For Automatic Number Plate Recognition (anpr) Infrastructure Development Privacy Impact Assessment
Business
Real Property Assessment Division First Level Appeal Application Form - Government Of The District Of Columbia
Financial
Related Categories
Parent category: Education