Basic Impact Assessment At Project Level Page 29
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36Method
Surveys
Rapid
Participant
Case
Participatory
Criteria
appraisal
observation
studies
Learning and
Action
10. Ability to elicit
Low
Medium
High
High
Medium
views of women
(if
and
targeted)
disadvantaged
groups
11. Ability to
Low
High
Very high
High
High
capture
unexpected or
negative
impacts
12. Ability to
Low
High
High
Medium
High
identify
(due to
low
and articulate felt
coverage)
needs
13. Degree of
participation
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Very high
encouraged by
method
14. Potential to
contribute to
Low
High
Low
Medium
Very high
stakeholder
to low
capacity
building
15. Probability of
Low
High
Medium
Medium
High
enhancing
downwards
accountability
Specialist
High skilled
Medium skilled
Medium
16. Human
High skilled
supervision
practition-
practitioners, with
skilled
resource
practitioners
- large
ers,who are
good
practit-
requirements
numbers of
able to rite
supervision, who
ioners with
less qual-
-up and
are prepared to
good
ified field
analyse
commit for
super-
workers
results
lengthy period
vision
Very high
17. Cost range
High to
Medium to low
Medium
High to Medium
to medium
medium
to low
Very high
18. Timescale
Medium to
High
High to
Medium to low
to medium
low
medium
Surveys
Rapid
Participant
Case
Participatory
learning and action
appraisal
observation
studies
Source: Adapted from Montgomery et. al. (1996).
29
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Privacy Impact Assessment Update For The Advance Passenger Information System (apis) - U.s. Department Of Homeland Security - 2013
Legal
Template For Automatic Number Plate Recognition (anpr) Infrastructure Development Privacy Impact Assessment
Business
Real Property Assessment Division First Level Appeal Application Form - Government Of The District Of Columbia
Financial
Related Categories
Parent category: Education