Standard Form 30 - Amendment Of Solicitation/modification Of Contract (Page 18 of 40) in pdf

CONTRACT NO.

DELIVERY ORDER NO.

AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

PAGE

FINAL

N00178-04-D-4147

HR18

16 of 38

- Security classification of equipment, systems, operations, etc.

The contractor, subcontractors and their personnel shall employ the following countermeasures to mitigate the susceptibility of critical

information to exploitation, when applicable:

Practice OPSEC and facilitate OPSEC awareness;

Immediately retrieve documents from printers assessable by the public;

Shred sensitive and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) documents when no longer needed;

Protect information from personnel without a need-to-know;

When promulgating information, limit details to that essential for legitimacy;

During testing and evaluation, practice OPSEC methodologies of staging out of sight, desensitization, or speed of execution,

whenever possible.

8.0

RELEASE OF INFORMATION

Release of information shall be in accordance with Section I, DFARS Clause 252.204-7000, Disclosure of Information.

9.0

PERFORMANCE BASED REQUIREMENTS

This requirement is performance based. The contractor’s performance will be evaluated by the government as described in the Quality

Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). The first evaluation will cover the period ending six months after date of contract award with

successive evaluations being performed at the end of each twelve-month period of performance thereafter until the contractor completes

performance under all tasks. Evaluations will be posted to the Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS). The

Contractor’s performance under this task order will be evaluated in the following areas:

Quality of Product/Service

Schedule

Cost Control

Business Relations

Management of Key Personnel

The following five level assessment rating system will be used to evaluate a Contractor's performance.

Overall Performance

Standard

Rating

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few

minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly

effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some

minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed

contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the

contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being

assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified

corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not

likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious

problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

The Contractor may obtain more information regarding the CPARS process at the following internet site:

https://

/cparsmain.htm.

9.1

Performance Objectives, Standards and Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)

The Task Order service requirements are summarized below into Performance Objectives, Performance Standards and AQLs that relate

directly to mission essential items. The performance thresholds describe the minimally acceptable levels of service required for each

requirement and are considered critical to mission success. Procedures as set forth in the FAR 52.246-5, Inspection of Services – Cost

Reimbursement, shall be utilized to remedy all deficiencies.

Acceptable Quality

Work Area

Performance Objective

Performance Standard

Level (AQL)

Standard Form 30 - Amendment Of Solicitation/modification Of Contract Page 18

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories