Job Analysis Report Page 13
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38Job Analysis Report
Classification
items are supported by both the class spec and the current job analysis in accordance
with state regulations
####
SMEs participated in the linking process.
The SMEs used a consensus method
OR
to determine the linkages.
SMEs completed the linkage exercise independently,
then the data was analyzed by TV&C to determine consensus.
(See APPENDIX L: Task/KSAPC Linkage Data)
REVIEW of SELECTION OPTIONS
Each KSAPC statement was reviewed to determine which assessment modality
would be the most effective method of measurement. After reviewing the final task
and KSAPC results,
Department
staff developed a Selection Options Matrix detailing
examination options for all retained KSAPCs. The intent and purpose is to examine
and review all possible examination options to ensure the development of a valid
and reliable testing process that identifies the most qualified candidates while
minimizing potential bias in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform
Guidelines.
It is not uncommon for a KSAPC to be measurable using a variety of methods. For
example, a person’s ability to review information and take appropriate action may be
measured using a written exam (e.g., a multiple choice exam), a structured interview,
or a job simulation activity, among other methods.
Subsequent selection procedures are to be developed in accordance with the
provisions of the Uniform Guidelines and based upon the results of this study,
provided that the job-analytic data remains current and reflective of the
classifications’ work behaviors (tasks performed), and the requisite important and
required KSAPCs used in the work behaviors to successfully perform these tasks
(See APPENDIX M: Selection Options Matrix)
ACCURACY and COMPLETENESS
This job analysis was conducted and documented by
Consultant
Name, with the
Unit/Program
Area/Dept., in conformance with the Uniform Guidelines and
professionally accepted standards. All documentation derived from this study has
been included in this report or can be found in the
Classification
project file.
This report is considered valid and current three to six years from
Month and Year of
project
completion.
To ensure the accuracy and completeness of this study, the following steps were
taken:
8
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Business