Job Analysis Report Page 9
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38Job Analysis Report
Classification
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature relevant to this job analysis was reviewed to familiarize project staff with the
duties and responsibilities of the Classification. Literature reviewed included, but was
not limited to, (a) previous job analyses, (b) studies that have been conducted on the
job related to reclassification or compensation, (c) job duty statements, (d) job class
specifications, or (e) departmental history files and (f) other general sources such as
the Occupational Network Online (O*NET). These documents were used to develop a
basic understanding of the nature and requirements of the job in question. A
preliminary list of task statements as well as KSAPC statements was generated based
on the review of these documents.
JOB AUDITS/INTERVIEWS
If audits are conducted:
The project methodology requires the participation of SMEs
with in-depth knowledge of the analyzed classification.
X # of
audits/interviews were
conducted with the assigned SMEs to achieve the following goals: (a) verify/determine
whether the tasks and KSAPCs that were identified through the review of archival
literature were accurate representations of the job and (b) to identify appropriate
modifications or additions to the list of task and KSAPC statements.
If audits aren’t conducted:
Due to the small number of SMEs in the analyzed
classification,
Department
determined that job audits/interviews were not appropriate
for the study, and that the relevant information might more effectively be developed in
the Job Analysis panel meeting.
Or:
Due to the recentness of the previous job analysis,
Department
determined that
job audits/interviews were not appropriate for the study, and that the relevant
information might more effectively be developed in the Job Analysis meeting. In this
meeting, the previously developed list of tasks and KSAPCs were refined and
enhanced to reflect the [classification] as it is currently used.
(See APPENDIX F: Subject Matter Expert Participants)
JOB ANALYSIS PANEL MEETING
A critical step in the content validation process is establishing that the tasks and
KSAPCs identified during archival review and/or job audits are truly representative of
the classification. The process used by
Department
to ensure that the relative list of
tasks/KSAPCs are thorough and complete is to conduct Job Analysis panel meetings
in which a group of SMEs (which includes current job incumbents and supervisors)
review and edit the tasks/KSAPCs, as well as add additional tasks/KSAPCs that were
not identified in the initial phases of the process. The meetings should include
representation from all different units/programs/areas of the classification to ensure
that the tasks/KSAPCs represent the job as a whole. For this study, a Job Analysis
panel meeting was conducted on
(date).
(See APPENDIX F: Subject Matter Expert Participants)
4
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Business