Evaluation Plan Guidance Page 21

ADVERTISEMENT

EVALUATION PLAN GUIDANCE
SOCIAL INNOVATION FUND
designs can do a good job of evaluating how a program affects participants
(internal
validity) approaching that
of experimental designs, but use of a single case limits the generalizability
(external
validity) of the results to
other groups. One form of the single case design—repeated measures taken prior to treatment delivery and
repeated measures after treatment delivery—is a form of the interrupted time series, but the time series is
typically measured on one individual.
Specific Guidance: Single-Group Designs - Single Subject (or Case)
If a single group design is proposed, each intervention stage of the design should be detailed, including the
baseline stage. The number of measurement points at each phase should be adequate such that trends can be
established and threats to internal validity can be minimized.
Interrupted Time Series Design
Occasionally, an evaluation examines a single group of individuals before and
Additional Resources
after participation in an intervention, with no attempt at controlling who is
The Department of
part of the group. This form of evaluation, referred to as an interrupted time
Education’s What Works
series design with a single group (such as a school or classroom), attempts to
Clearinghouse
(at
capture any change that occurred to the individuals after program
)
participation by examining the general trend found in multiple measures of an
provides many resources
outcome over time.
related to evaluation design.
Data collected across time are referred to as longitudinal data (in comparison
A
description of interrupted
to cross-sectional data, which are collected at one point in time). Longitudinal
time series designs
is given by
data are defined as repeated measurements on individuals (sites, groups, etc.)
Imbens and Lemieux (2008),
over time. Many researchers use the specific term “time series” to refer only to
(available here:
data collected over time from different sets of individuals (as compared to
t/classes/eco7377/papers/imbe
“longitudinal data,” which refers to data collected from the same individuals
ns%20lemieux.pdf)
over time). However, the term “interrupted time series” is used commonly in
evaluation research to refer to a specific form of longitudinal data analysis,
See Bickman and Rog (2009)
and so is used here to refer to all types of data used in this type of evaluation.
for information on many
The frequency of these measurements and units, and the length of time,
different evaluation designs.
depends on the program or policy being assessed. Simply put, repeated
measurements are made on units prior to implementation (the comparison
See Khandker, Koolwal, and
group) and after implementation (the treatment group). The interruption in
Samad (2010) for information
the time series (or patterns before and after program implementation) can be
on propensity score matching
and regression discontinuity
estimated graphically or statistically (Imbens & Lemieux, 2008).
design.
The interrupted time series design has been most frequently and effectively
See Shadish, Cook, and
used when the intervention is a program or policy of significant scope, such as
Campbell (2002) for citations
community interventions to improve child-rearing practices or mandatory
of studies that have used the
seat belt laws in a state. The social evaluation research literature includes
interrupted time series design.
many descriptions and examples of the development and implementation of
this design and the analysis of data generated by it (Bickman & Rog, 2009;
Khandker, Koolwal, & Samad, 2010; Rossi, Lipsey, & Freeman, 2004; Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002).
Additionally, although this design is listed as a single-group design, a comparison group is usually needed to
address the possibility that extraneous events linked to how data were collected or outcomes were developed
nationalservice.gov/SIF
18

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Education