Evaluation Plan Guidance Page 38
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68EVALUATION PLAN GUIDANCE
SOCIAL INNOVATION FUND
In terms of oversight, include a description of who, at the program level, is reviewing evaluation plans
provided by the evaluator(s) and their qualifications to do so. In addition, the description of oversight should
discuss how the program will make sure that the evaluator stays on schedule, produces the required
evaluation products (e.g., design, instruments, data, analysis, reports), and how the individual(s) providing
oversight can determine the quality of the products and whether they meet standards of scientific evidence
and conform to rigorous requirements such as those expected by the SIF.
Finally, the section on evaluator independence is the place to explain how the findings will be released. What
are the roles of the program in releasing the evaluation findings? Does the evaluator have the ability to release
findings independent of the program? How will all parties ensure that findings are released in a timely
manner?
nationalservice.gov/SIF
35
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Education