Evaluation Plan Guidance Page 46
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68EVALUATION PLAN GUIDANCE
SOCIAL INNOVATION FUND
Single Group Design (if applicable)
Each intervention phase of the design, including the baseline condition, is clearly described.
Number of measures during each measurement phase is detailed.
Number of measures during each measurement phase is sufficient to establish trend and rule out rival explanations.
Timing of measures pre/post interruption is appropriate to the intervention.
Interrupted Time Series Design (if applicable)
Number of measurement points before and after the intervention is described.
The number of measures during each measurement phase is shown to be sufficient to establish a trend and rule out rival
explanations.
The timing of measures pre/post interruption is shown to be appropriate to the intervention.
Comparison cases are clearly described.
Pre-Experimental Design (if applicable)
Full study design is clearly and comprehensively explained.
Description of the treatment and counterfactual groups are included.
Where appropriate, assignment of study participants to groups is described.
Additional threats to the internal validity of the design are discussed.
Ways future evaluations can be designed to rule out these threats are described.
Feasibility Study (if applicable)
Full study design is clearly and comprehensively explained.
Description of the treatment and counterfactual groups are included.
Where appropriate, assignment of study participants to groups is described.
The instruments or processes to be tested in the feasibility study are described.
Combination Design (if applicable)
Clear details of all design components are provided.
A rational for using a combined approach that identifies how that approach addresses threats to internal and external validity is
discussed.
Implementation Evaluation
Specific plans for measuring fidelity of program implementation (i.e., how well the program was actually implemented) in the
program group are presented.
Plans for measuring the level of program services the program group actually received, including the criteria for assessing
whether an adequate amount and quality of the program was delivered to participants, are described.
Plans for assessing whether the control or comparison group received program services, including the criteria for assess the extent
to which there was diffusion of the program to the control or comparison group are provided.
B.6
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Education