Evaluation Plan Guidance Page 51
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68EVALUATION PLAN GUIDANCE
SOCIAL INNOVATION FUND
Prior Evidence of Program Effectiveness- Sample Table
Study Type
Title, Author,
Peer
Date of
(RCT, QED,
Publication Year and
Review
Data
Outcomes
Sample
Sample
Outcome
Similarity to
Source of Study
(Y/N)
Collection
only)
Size
Description
Measures
Key Study Results
Effect Sizes
Proposed Program
Parents of participants
Effects of After School
were more likely than
Character Education on
Elementary
non-participants to
This study focused
Reading Scores, Smith,
School students
report that their children
.2 for parent
on the same
R.L. and Doe, J.M. 2002
grades 2-5, in a
CTBS,
had improved reading
group
intervention at a
Private evaluation
district with 65%
Participant
skills.
differences
different site, with
available at
400 T
Hispanic
and Parent
No significant difference
N/A for
a different
N
1999-2000
RCT
300 C
population.
Surveys
was found on test scores.
children
population.
Elementary
School students
in a district with
35% African
Study of the same
“Our Annex” 2009
American and
TOWRE
Tested children gained
intervention
Program Evaluation
35% Hispanic
Participant
an average of 2 grade
conducted at the
Report, 2009
N
2010
Outcomes
80
population
Surveys
levels on the TOWRE
Not calculated
same program site
C.2
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Education