State Performance Plan 2005-2012 - Part B - Arkansas Department Of Education Page 235

ADVERTISEMENT

Arkansas Department of Education Special Education Unit
Part B State Performance Plan
programs are placed in a designated year of the three-year cycle. However, the SEA reserves the right to
schedule additional, off-cycle monitoring of any program at any time should conditions warrant.
M/PE Area Supervisors have the primary responsibility for monitoring special education programs within
Arkansas Local education agencies (LEA; school district), as well as in the Education Service Cooperatives
(ESC) that provide services on behalf of their member school districts to eligible children with disabilities
ages 3-5 (pre-school). Supervisors in the NTP Section have the primary responsibility for monitoring the
non-traditional programs, those being the state-operated and state-supported programs. However, the staffs
of these sections work cooperatively in the monitoring process.
Monitoring consists of an SEA review of eleven (11) issue areas. The eleven (11) issue areas addressed
consist of the following:
• Child Find
• Least Restrictive Environment
• Due Process
• Confidentiality of Information
• Protection in Evaluation Procedures
• System of Personnel Development
• Procedures for Evaluating Specific Learning
• Children with Disabilities in Private
Disabilities
Schools
• Individualized Education Programs
• Use of Funds
• Free Appropriate Public Education
In preparation for monitoring, the ADE-SEU Area Supervisor contacts the Local education agency (LEA) or
ESC (Co-op) at least three weeks prior to an on-site visit. A General Program Checklist to be completed by
the LEA, as well as other requested information is to be submitted prior to the ADE-SEU staff on-site
review. In addition, ADE-SEU staff review archival and current data maintained by the ADE-SEU relative
to the education program to be monitored. The purpose of off-site data collection is to assure basic
knowledge of each special education program and to determine, where possible, emerging patterns of
noncompliance or those already in existence. Indicators were developed and applied based on historical
discipline, exiting, disproportionality, student performance data, and educational placement data. In addition
to historical data, these indicators took into account the results of the three-year monitoring cycle by
focusing on numbers and severity of previous Corrective Action Plans (CAPs), and complaints and due
process hearings with findings of noncompliance. Whenever possible, records should be reviewed for the
past three (3) years and should include, but not be limited to:
1. Child Count records/Disabling Conditions/
9. ACSIP (Arkansas Comprehensive School
Placements (LRE)
Improvement Plan)
2. LEA Special Education Budget
10. Hearings and Investigations
3. LEA Annual Financial Report (AFR)
11. Surrogate parent program data
4. Previous visitation letters
12. AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) status
5. Previous monitoring reports
13. Statewide Assessment data
6. Annual Statistical Report
14. IDEA indicators data
a) District Profile
15. IDEA “trigger” data
b) Indicator Report
16. IDEA determination status
c) Program Approval
17. Residential Treatment Facility
7. Extended Year Services data
Reimbursement, if applicable
8. Non-bonded debt
Page | 233

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 277