State Performance Plan 2005-2012 - Part B - Arkansas Department Of Education Page 26

ADVERTISEMENT

Arkansas Department of Education Special Education Unit
Part B State Performance Plan
Describe the method used to collect data: The single-year event data for this indicator is
collected through the Arkansas Public School Computer Network (APSCN) student
information system and submitted through the EDEN submission system (ESS) by the ADE
Data Administration Office. Data Administration provides the numbers for this indicator to
the Special Education Unit. The data reflects students enrolled in grades 7-12.
In 2010, Arkansas anticipates the percentage of youth with IEPs dropping out of school to
FFY 2009
decline to 4.25%.
In 2011, Arkansas anticipates the percentage of youth with IEPs dropping out of school to
FFY 2010
decline to 4.20%.
In 2011, Arkansas anticipates the percentage of youth with IEPs dropping out of school to
FFY 2011
decline to 4.20%.
In 2011, Arkansas anticipates the percentage of youth with IEPs dropping out of school to
FFY 2012
decline to 4.20%.
Improvement Activities/Timelines/Resources
The State is mindful of the close interrelationship of State Performance Plan Indicators
FFY 2005
centering on graduation rates, dropout rates, coordinated and measurable IEP goals, and post-school
success. This interrelationship has been documented in prior State Annual Performance Reports (APRs)
highlighting the ongoing emphasis on the general supervision continuous improvement monitoring system
which focuses on specific school districts showing poor performance on graduation and dropout rate
indicators and secondary grade benchmark assessment results. Prior APRs have also documented the
ongoing development of technical assistance and direct service models designed to demonstrate to school
districts the importance of effective early transition strategic planning (prior to age 16) in the areas of
training, education, employment, and independent living designed to increase educational benefit and
improve post-school outcomes for youth with IEPs.
These activities are considered critical in meeting the improvement targets set in the SPP. These and other
critical elements were identified in 2005-06 through the use of the National Alliance for Secondary
Education and Transition (NASET) Self-Assessment Tool. State partners in secondary and postsecondary
education established the Arkansas planning priorities prior to the National Center for Secondary Education
and Transition (NCSET) National Leadership Summit using this tool.
Of the five NASET quality indicators, three (schooling, career preparation, and connecting activities) were
chosen by the Arkansas team as priorities for comprehensive planning. Within each of these three priorities,
goals and action steps were developed to guide strategies during 2005-06. The three priorities identified
are:
SCHOOLING: In order to perform at optimal levels in all educational settings, all youth need to
participate in educational programs grounded in standards, clear performance expectations, and
graduation exit options based upon meaningful, accurate, and relevant indicators of student learning and
skills. Often this occurs without the input from agencies outside of education. Arkansas needs to include
other agencies in its school planning to ensure the educational process provides: career and technical
Page | 24

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 277