Supervisor'S Performance Review Handbook Page 7
ADVERTISEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90Overview of LSSC
Performance Review Forms & Processes
The current performance review process and associated forms have been designed through
appropriate faculty and staff committees, and endorsed by the President’s Cabinet. Because all
College positions are not alike, specific performance review processes and forms have been
established to best meet the needs of the following employee groups:
Faculty (Instruction and Non-Instructional),
Administrator,
Managerial and Professional Technical, and
Professional Administrative, Professional Crafts & Trades employees.
Performance reviews or evaluations are specifically governed by LSSC Rule 5.16 and LSSC
Procedure 5-05.
A few common elements exist across all performance review forms and processes, but there
are significant differences also tailored to best meet the needs of each employee group.
Common to All Performance Reviews
All performance reviews require employees to self-evaluate and submit such to their respective
supervisors. Supervisors are to consider the employee’s self-evaluation information. Besides
being respectful to the employee, this action will enable the development of a more accurate,
collaborative and finalized performance review. Because of the College’s commitment to
Service Excellence (SE) the reviews contain a section on the SE standards with a rubric to
assist in assigning the appropriate performance rating.
Important: if one or more unsatisfactory ratings have been made for any Performance
Objective/Duty and/or Job Factor, then “Unsatisfactory” is to be marked as the Overall
Performance Rating. Also, a development plan with a timeline must be completed to
address how the unsatisfactory rating(s) will be improved to a satisfactory level. Consult
with Human Resources Executive Director.
Performance reviews are signed-off by the next higher level above the supervisor/evaluator
BEFORE that individual conducts the formal performance review discussion with the respective
employee.
Significant Differences per Each Employee Group Performance Review
Faculty Performance Reviews
Faculty performance reviews fall into two formats: Instructional and Non-Instructional for
Librarians. Besides these formats both covering critical job duties and responsibilities, both
reviews also contain a major section assessing the employee’s progress toward the
Supervisor’s Performance Review Handbook rev 7/5/12
Page 7
ADVERTISEMENT
0 votes
Related Articles
Related forms
Related Categories
Parent category: Business